Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Kikar HaShabbatPolitics

Court Rejects Sara Netanyahu's Lawsuit, Orders Her to Pay Damages

Translated & summarized from Kikar HaShabbat by baba

ReligiousNeutral tone

Hebrew · 4 newsrooms covering

A court dismissed Sara Netanyahu's lawsuit against former Prime Minister's residence employee Silvi Gancia, ordering Netanyahu to pay 10,000 shekels in legal costs. The court found Netanyahu treated Gancia inappropriately, dismissively, and humiliatingly, and that Gancia's published claims were true. Attorney Shaul Ida represented Gancia pro bono.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Sara Netanyahu's lawsuit against former employee Silvi Gancia was dismissed by a court.
  • Netanyahu must pay Gancia 10,000 shekels for legal expenses.
  • The court ruled Netanyahu treated Gancia in an inappropriate, dismissive, and humiliating manner.
  • The court found Gancia's published claims about the treatment to be true.
  • Attorney Shaul Ida represented Gancia on a pro bono basis.
Court Rejects Sara Netanyahu's Lawsuit, Orders Her to Pay Damages
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

A court on Sunday dismissed a lawsuit filed by Sara Netanyahu, wife of the Prime Minister, against Silvi Gancia, a former employee at the Prime Minister's residence. Netanyahu was ordered to pay Gancia 10,000 shekels in legal expenses.

The court not only rejected Netanyahu's claim but also ruled that her treatment of the former employee was inappropriate and that Gancia's allegations, as published, were found to be true. The judge's ruling stated, "The plaintiff (Sara Netanyahu), I hereby determine, did indeed treat the defendant in an inappropriate, dismissive, and humiliating manner. The defendant's claims in the publications were proven to be true."

The ruling indicates the court examined Gancia's claims and did not accept Netanyahu's position. The judge's description of Netanyahu's conduct as inappropriate, dismissive, and humiliating, along with the confirmation of Gancia's published claims, formed the core of the decision. The specific publications in dispute and the full text of the ruling were not detailed in the report.

Additionally, it was reported that attorney Shaul Ida represented Gancia on a pro bono basis throughout the legal proceedings. The final decision includes both the dismissal of Netanyahu's lawsuit and the court's explicit findings regarding Gancia's treatment and the veracity of her published statements.

Kikar HaShabbatHaredi · Bnei Brak

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 4 outlets
First: Srugim · 1h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire