VAR Controversy Mars Jerusalem's Draw, Coaches Debate Calls

Beitar Jerusalem conceded a 98th-minute equalizer from a contentious penalty, resulting in a 1-1 draw at home against Ironi Kiryat Shmona. The draw left Beitar Jerusalem with only one point from the match.

Aviram Baruchyan, Beitar's assistant coach, expressed strong disappointment with the penalty decision, stating that video analysis confirmed his belief it was not a foul. He asserted that the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) should have intervened, especially given the late stage of the game. Baruchyan also acknowledged that his team could have secured the win earlier by capitalizing on their scoring opportunities.

Baruchyan further commented on the team's offensive performance, noting the creation of many half-chances and the need for greater hunger to convert them into goals. He mentioned that Almog Cohen received a red card and Moshe Ohayon would be unavailable, but expressed confidence that the team would prepare adequately for their next match against Tiberias.

On the opposing side, Kiryat Shmona's coach, who was referred to as "Shi Barda" in the article, expressed happiness with securing a point, acknowledging his team's struggles and newness. He defended the penalty call by questioning why similar incidents favoring Kiryat Shmona were not reviewed. Barda stated he was willing to trade all questionable calls from the season to settle the matter.

Barda also admitted his team lacked offensive ideas and that adjustments are needed, but expressed satisfaction with the point gained. He highlighted Kiryat Shmona's past successes despite player sales and pledged to make necessary adaptations with the current squad.