Sport5Sports10:55

Referees' Association Rules Penalty Should Have Been Awarded to Maccabi Tel Aviv in Toto Cup Final

By מוטי פשכצקי

Translated & summarized from Sport5 by baba

SportsCharged tone

Hebrew · 4 newsrooms covering

Israel's Referees' Association ruled that Maccabi Tel Aviv was wrongly denied a penalty in their Toto Cup final loss to Hapoel Tel Aviv. The committee found a foul in the box by Omri Altman on Dor Peretz should have resulted in a penalty. They also stated Mohamed Ali Camara should have received a red card for a late foul, not a yellow.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

Referees' Association says Maccabi Tel Aviv deserved a penalty in Toto Cup final.
Committee found Omri Altman's foul on Dor Peretz in the box was a penalty.
VAR should have intervened on the missed penalty call, the association stated.
Mohamed Ali Camara should have received a red card for a late foul, not yellow.
Hapoel Tel Aviv defeated Maccabi Tel Aviv 3-2 in the final match.

Referees' Association Rules Penalty Should Have Been Awarded to Maccabi Tel Aviv in Toto Cup Final — Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

The Professional Committee of the Referees' Association has ruled that Maccabi Tel Aviv should have been awarded a penalty kick during the Toto Cup final match, which saw Hapoel Tel Aviv defeat Maccabi Tel Aviv 3-2. The committee reviewed the game, which took place on Thursday, and focused on referee Schnir Levy's decision not to call a penalty after Omri Altman's foul on Dor Peretz in the penalty area.

The association stated that the decision was incorrect, noting that the foul occurred while a Maccabi Tel Aviv player was in control of the ball and prevented him from continuing play. They added that the VAR official should have intervened since no penalty was called on the field.

Additionally, the committee addressed a foul committed by Maccabi Tel Aviv defender Mohamed Ali Camara in the 86th minute. While Camara received a yellow card, the association determined he should have been shown a red card for a serious foul. They described the foul as high-intensity and brutal, posing a significant risk to the opponent's safety, and stated that the VAR official should have intervened in this instance as well.