Judge Questions Ignoring Witness Testimony on Illegal Actions in Netanyahu Trial
Translated & summarized from Kikar HaShabbat by baba
In the Netanyahu trial, Judge Bar-Am allowed an expanded investigation, rejecting the prosecution's objection. He questioned how to ignore testimony from Legal Advisor Mandelblit regarding alleged illegal actions. Prosecutor Tirosh argued for limiting the inquiry to the legal advisor's approvals.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Judge Bar-Am allowed an expanded investigation in the Netanyahu trial.
- The judge questioned ignoring testimony about alleged illegal actions.
- The prosecution objected to broadening the scope of the inquiry.
- Prosecutor Tirosh argued to limit the investigation to approvals.
- Legal Advisor Mandelblit testified in the trial.
During a hearing concerning the scope of the investigation into Benjamin Netanyahu's trial, Judge Bar-Am rejected the prosecution's objection to expanding the inquiry. The judge stated that "the door has already been opened, he testified and we heard things that apparently require deeper clarification." He questioned how it is possible to ignore the fact that the legal advisor testified about illegal actions. The prosecutor, Tirosh, argued that the investigation should be limited solely to the legal advisor's approvals.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Right 3Haredi 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
