Ophakim Residents Divided on Leadership Amidst Election Uncertainty
Translated & summarized from Davar by baba
Residents of Ophakim, particularly in the Mishor Gefen neighborhood where many were killed on October 7th, expressed mixed feelings about leadership in the upcoming elections. While some, like Uriah and Ari Semach, are voting for Netanyahu due to a perceived need for a strong leader, others, like Lyudmila Kazakov, are angry with his security record. Neria Sarusi emphasized the need for a Jewish state and conflict resolution. Tensions were high among Russian-speaking voters, with debates over past political alliances and current security concerns.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Ophakim residents, including October 7th survivors, are voting amidst deep disillusionment with leadership.
- Some residents, like Uriah and Ari Semach, are voting for Netanyahu, seeking a strong leader.
- Lyudmila Kazakov expressed anger over security failures and perceived discrimination against Russian speakers.
- Neria Sarusi stressed the importance of a Jewish state and conflict resolution in his vote.
- Tensions were evident among Russian-speaking voters debating past and present political allegiances.
In the eastern neighborhood of Mishor Gefen in Ophakim, where 24 residents and 6 security personnel were killed on October 7th, election day passed with relative calm, with no major surprises anticipated. Many residents, like Uriah and Ari Semach, who married a year prior, expressed disillusionment with leadership, particularly following the Hamas attacks. Ari stated he voted for Netanyahu this time after previously supporting Ben Gvir, emphasizing the need for a decisive leader. Uriah felt let down by Eisenkot's refusal to sit with the Likud. The Semachs acknowledged their vote might be stereotypical but stressed the need for coexistence.
Neria Sarusi, 20, who is soon to enlist, declared, "What happened in France must not happen here. Dozens of people were murdered here in Ophakim, there is no coexistence. We are a Jewish state." His vote was predetermined, driven by a desire for settlement and conflict resolution.
Among Russian-speaking pensioners, a palpable tension was evident. Many, who had historically voted for Liberman, had shifted to Netanyahu but were now reconsidering. Lyudmila Kazakov, 70, voiced anger over what she perceived as systematic discrimination against Russian speakers, inadequate political representation, educational funding struggles, and, most critically, security failures. She criticized Netanyahu's past "understandings" with Gaza, while others countered by questioning Liberman's past alliances.
Peter Beazov, 68, distributing Likud flyers, accused internal, funded efforts to oust Netanyahu and blamed Liberman for betraying Netanyahu by aligning with the left and Arabs. He believes the October 7th attacks stemmed from internal betrayal near the Prime Minister. While not fully trusting Netanyahu, Beazov considers him the most experienced and courageous option to lead the country through its current challenges, especially with new leadership being unsuitable now. He became emotional discussing Rimon Kirsh, a hostage survivor, whom he has known since childhood.