Netanyahu-Katz Clash With IDF Chief Over Hebron Operation May End Zamir's Term
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir's opposition to continuing an operation in Hebron has led to a severe rift with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz. This dispute, coupled with differing views on Iran policy, could lead to Zamir not receiving a fourth year as Chief of Staff if Netanyahu wins the upcoming elections. Netanyahu and Katz have denied reports of plans to dismiss Zamir.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir's disagreement with Netanyahu and Katz over Hebron operation may cost him a fourth year in command.
- Zamir opposed continuing the Hebron operation, citing operational limits and resident concerns.
- Netanyahu and Katz ordered the Hebron operation's renewal for deterrence and retribution.
- The dispute highlights a deep crisis in relations between Zamir and the political leadership.
- Election results may determine Zamir's future, with a Netanyahu victory potentially leading to his dismissal.
- Zamir and the political echelon also differ on the approach to Iran policy and potential strikes.
Disagreements between IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz over a recent operation in Hebron could jeopardize Zamir's potential for a fourth year in command. During a discussion at the Palmachim base, Zamir opposed the political leadership's directive to continue IDF operations in Hebron following a deadly terror attack, arguing the operation had reached its operational limits and that residents should be allowed to return to their homes. The IDF halted the operation based on Zamir's assessment, but Netanyahu and Katz ordered its renewal for deterrence and retribution purposes, with Katz stating the investigation into the attack was incomplete.
The clash highlights a significant crisis in relations between Zamir and the political echelon, particularly with Katz. The outcome of the upcoming elections may influence Zamir's future, as a continued Netanyahu-Katz government is expected to seek his removal. Zamir had presented intelligence suggesting the attackers might have been directed from abroad, possibly by Hamas elements in Turkey, and believed forces should be redeployed to other fronts. This view was supported by field commanders who also deemed the operation operationally exhausted.
Zamir also expressed concerns about the risk to soldiers, unnecessary friction, and potential escalation, while the political leadership viewed the continued lockdown and displacement of residents as a necessary response. The debate reportedly became heated, with the decision ultimately made to continue the operation.
Further disagreements exist regarding Iran. While the IDF believes there is no immediate need to strike Iran before the elections unless an Iranian attack is imminent, they are monitoring developments and preparing accordingly. The IDF is concerned about public statements by Netanyahu and Katz regarding a potential strike, fearing they could increase Iranian suspicion and lead to miscalculation and unintended escalation. Zamir has warned that such rhetoric could trigger a dangerous cycle of actions and reactions.
Netanyahu and Katz have denied reports of plans to dismiss Zamir, with Katz stating he recommended Zamir's appointment and that they are working together for Israel's security with unprecedented achievements.
