Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

MaarivPolitics

Court Rejects Bid to Censor Joint List AI Video Featuring Ministers

Translated & summarized from Maariv by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

The Election Committee chairman, Judge Noam Sohlberg, rejected a petition to censor an AI video by the Joint List party featuring Knesset Member Ahmad Tibi playing soccer with Ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. Sohlberg ruled that the video's unrealistic nature makes it clear to viewers that it is not authentic. The petitioner was ordered to pay 5,000 shekels in expenses.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Court rejects petition to censor AI video of MK Ahmad Tibi playing soccer with ministers.
  • Judge Noam Sohlberg ruled the video's unrealistic nature is clear to viewers.
  • The AI video depicted MK Tibi playing soccer with Ministers Ben-Gvir and Smotrich.
  • The petitioner must pay 5,000 shekels in expenses.
  • The ruling concerns an AI-generated campaign video by the Joint List party.

The Election Committee chairman, Judge Noam Sohlberg, has dismissed a petition seeking to censor an AI-generated video by the Joint List party. The video humorously depicts Knesset Member Ahmad Tibi playing soccer with Ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.

In his ruling, Judge Sohlberg emphasized that the video clearly presents a soccer match where the participants, Tibi, Ben-Gvir, and Smotrich, are shown wearing suits while playing professionally. He noted that Ben-Gvir appears as both a defender and a goalkeeper, and Smotrich is depicted as two different defenders, sometimes in the same frame. The judge stated it is evident that the video is not intended as authentic documentation and there is no concern that viewers would mistake it for reality.

Consequently, Sohlberg determined that it is clear to any viewer that the event did not occur in reality and is not original documentation. Therefore, the requirement for labeling the content as artificial did not apply. The petition was rejected, and the petitioner was ordered to pay the respondent 5,000 shekels in expenses.

MaarivCentre · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire