Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Makor RishonSecurity

UN Watch Exposes Lack of Transparency in UN Experts' Funding

Translated & summarized from Makor Rishon by baba

RightCharged tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

The NGO UN Watch has released a report detailing approximately $88.2 million in external funding received by UN human rights experts between 2016 and 2025 from 366 donors, including governments and private foundations. The report, presented in the UK Parliament, highlights a lack of transparency in over $42 million of this funding, with specific concerns raised about donations from countries like China and Russia. UN Watch calls for increased oversight and stricter reporting requirements to ensure the independence of UN experts.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • UN Watch documented $88.2 million in external funding for UN human rights experts from 366 donors.
  • Over $42 million of the reported funding exhibited transparency issues, according to UN Watch.
  • Funding from China, Russia, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia to UN experts was highlighted in the report.
  • The report specifically examined funding for UN Special Rapporteurs on terrorism and Palestinian territories.
  • UN Watch calls for greater transparency and oversight of UN experts' financial dealings.

An investigation by the Geneva-based NGO UN Watch has revealed significant financial ties between UN human rights experts and external donors, including governments and private foundations, raising concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest. The findings were presented at a parliamentary meeting in the UK, chaired by former Home Secretary Priti Patel.

UN Watch's research, titled "From Watchdogs to Ideologues," created a public database analyzing the annual financial disclosures of UN experts against US tax records, grant documents, and other public sources. The database documents approximately $88.2 million in financial and in-kind support provided between 2016 and 2025 to 140 experts by 366 external donors. According to UN Watch, over $42 million of this support exhibited at least one transparency issue, such as incomplete information, improperly documented funding sources, or alleged reporting violations.

A key concern highlighted is funding from governments facing international criticism for human rights abuses. The report details over $2.4 million in support from China and its affiliated bodies, $2.1 million from Russia, and $174,000 from Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Specific cases cited include $150,000 in support from China to Ben Saul, the Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism, and $100,000 from China to Yorgos Katrougalos, Chair of the Coordination Committee of UN Special Procedures, whose statements have been seen as favorable to Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The report also focuses on Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories. UN Watch estimates that support for her activities amounts to $2,563,753, including research assistance, travel, and logistical support, with some funding allegedly linked to Al Jazeera and organizations promoting Palestinian causes. The NGO also points to approximately $600,000 from unidentified sources and donations attributed to groups allegedly close to Hamas.

UN Watch further investigated funding channeled through intermediaries like universities and NGOs. Examples include a $200,000 grant from the Open Society Foundations to an organization founded by former Special Rapporteur on the right to health, Talaleng Mofokeng, and $600,000 in grants to New York University for activities related to former Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty, Philip Alston. UN Watch argues that the current reporting mechanisms do not always allow for tracing funding sources and assessing the experts' independence.

To address these issues, UN Watch proposes increased oversight, including periodic reviews of rapporteurs' work by a coalition of democratic states, banning earmarked external funding, establishing an independent audit mechanism, and stricter evidentiary requirements for reports. The NGO emphasizes that while external support is not inherently a violation, transparency regarding donors and conditions is crucial for maintaining the experts' impartiality and freedom from undue influence.

Makor RishonRight · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Related stories · 1

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire