Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 14

Israeli Election Campaigns Largely Ignore Economic Platforms

7 developments

IcePolitics

Israeli Parties Offer Grand Economic Promises Lacking Budgetary Detail

Translated & summarized from Ice by baba

BusinessCharged tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

Ahead of the upcoming Israeli elections, most political parties have failed to present comprehensive economic plans despite the high cost of living being a major voter concern. Parties like Likud, Shas, and United Torah Judaism have offered no economic platform, while others present ambitious, unfunded promises. Zehut proposes a radical free-market agenda, while Yisrael Beiteinu, "Together," "Yesh!," The Democrats, and a bloc including Yoaz Hendel and Yaron Zelekha offer various proposals for housing, taxes, and social benefits, often lacking detailed budget calculations.

The story in 6 lines · by baba

  • Most Israeli parties have not presented detailed economic plans for the upcoming elections, despite voter concerns about the cost of living.
  • The Zehut party advocates for a radical libertarian agenda with drastic reduction of state involvement and free market principles.
  • Yisrael Beiteinu offers a detailed plan prioritizing "servants and workers" with increased defense and social spending.
  • The "Together" party promises a NIS 1 million grant for reservists to buy apartments and 100,000 long-term rental units.
  • Parties like "Yesh!," The Democrats, and a bloc with Yoaz Hendel and Yaron Zelekha propose tax reforms and housing initiatives.
  • Many parties' economic proposals lack clear budget calculations and funding sources for their ambitious promises.

As Israelis head to the polls for the 26th Knesset elections, the cost of living and economic policy are top priorities for voters. However, a review of party platforms reveals a significant lack of detailed economic plans, with many parties offering large, unfunded promises. The current coalition parties, including Likud, Shas, United Torah Judaism, and Otzma Yehudit, have not presented specific economic platforms. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, running with the Zehut party led by Moshe Feiglin, is relying on his past achievements rather than a new economic plan.

The Zehut party proposes a radical libertarian agenda focused on a free market, drastically reducing state involvement, and lowering the cost of living through measures like dismantling the Israel Land Authority, eliminating planning committees and property taxes, and abolishing import tariffs. They also advocate for a flat tax, reduced corporate tax, and deregulation, with a significant retreat from social welfare programs, favoring private options in education, healthcare, and social security.

Opposition parties present plans but often omit the full cost and funding mechanisms. Yisrael Beiteinu, led by Avigdor Lieberman, offers the most detailed plan, prioritizing "servants and workers" with increased defense and police budgets, AI development, and housing assistance for young couples. To fund these, Lieberman proposes eliminating coalition funds, cutting subsidies to the Haredi sector, and streamlining the public sector, though a full budget balance is not provided.

The "Together" party (Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid) focuses on market concentration in food and increasing elder care benefits, promising a NIS 1 million grant for reservists to buy apartments, faster urban renewal, and 100,000 long-term rental units, with 40% subsidized. They also propose doubling old-age pensions for the poor, again without detailing funding sources.

"Yesh!" (Gadi Eisenkot) presents a state-liberal plan prioritizing those who serve and work, linking benefits to socioeconomic status and earning potential, not sector. They aim to reduce income tax by combating the black market and taxing negative-impact products, while dismantling monopolies and investing in infrastructure. Like most platforms, it lacks a full budget calculation.

The Democrats (Yair Golan) advocate for a social-democratic approach, targeting monopolies in food, pharmaceuticals, and energy, expanding price controls, and subsidizing public transport. They propose state intervention in housing with affordable and long-term rental construction, a shorter work week, and comprehensive long-term care insurance, but also lack a full budget outline.

Yoaz Hendel and Yaron Zelekha present an aggressive plan to reduce housing costs to 120 salaries, cut VAT to 12%, lower corporate and marginal tax rates, and provide a safety net for the self-employed. They also propose a new foreign-managed bank, charging existing banks interest on current accounts, privatizing training, dismantling agricultural councils, and breaking car import monopolies.

IceOther · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire