Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 11

Petition Seeks Ban on Channel 14 Interviewing Likud Candidates

2 developments

Now 14Politics

Channel 14 Wins Court Battle Over Election Broadcasts, Donates Funds

Translated & summarized from Now 14 by baba

RightCharged tone

Hebrew · Sole source

The Supreme Court rejected a petition to stop Channel 14 from hosting election candidates, ruling it upholds free speech. Justice Noam Sohlberg dismissed the case brought by left-wing groups, ordering them to pay 10,000 shekels in costs. Channel 14 will donate the funds to the legal battle of "Kach 100" fighters. The ruling is seen as a win for free expression in Israeli media.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court rejected petition against Channel 14's election candidate interviews.
  • Justice Noam Sohlberg ruled the channel invited candidates from all political camps.
  • Petitioners must pay 10,000 shekels in legal costs to Channel 14.
  • Channel 14 will donate the awarded funds to the "Kach 100" legal defense.
  • The ruling is seen as a victory for freedom of expression in Israeli media.

The Supreme Court has rejected a petition by left-wing organizations, led by former Meretz chairwoman Zehavit Galon, seeking to prevent Channel 14 from hosting election candidates. Deputy President of the Supreme Court, Justice Noam Sohlberg, dismissed the petition on Friday, ruling that the channel had presented evidence of inviting candidates from all political camps.

Sohlberg accepted Channel 14's argument that it systematically approached all parties and candidates, including those from the opposition. He stated that the opposition's consistent refusal to be interviewed, which they attributed to an "institutionalized media boycott," did not constitute a violation by the channel. The court found that demanding a ban on interviews would be anti-democratic and a severe blow to freedom of expression.

The petition, filed by "Zulat for Equality and Human Rights" and "The Movement for Fair Regulation," had claimed Channel 14 violated election propaganda laws by primarily hosting right-wing candidates. They sought an injunction to prohibit the channel from hosting Knesset candidates until election day, citing inequality.

Justice Sohlberg deemed the request for a broadcast ban an "extreme step" that would severely harm freedom of speech. He also noted the significant delay in filing the petition, which came just two weeks before the elections. The court ordered the petitioners to pay 10,000 shekels in legal costs, to be divided between Channel 14 and the Second Authority for Television and Radio.

Channel 14 announced that the awarded funds would be donated to the legal defense of fighters from "Kach 100." The ruling is considered a significant victory for Channel 14 and the principle of free speech in Israeli media.

Now 14Right · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Related stories · 2

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire