Reality TV Stars Clash Over Divorce, Millions in Assets
Translated & summarized from Ice by baba
Former reality TV stars Sapir Bargil and Avraham Aklum are publicly feuding over their divorce, which has been stalled for 18 months. Bargil accuses Aklum of withholding her religious divorce document, while Aklum claims a legal battle over millions of shekels in assets and property is ongoing. Bargil insists financial issues should be separate from the divorce, but Aklum argues they are intertwined.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Sapir Bargil accuses Avraham Aklum of withholding her religious divorce for 18 months.
- Avraham Aklum claims a legal dispute over millions of shekels is ongoing.
- Bargil insists the divorce should be granted independently of financial disagreements.
- Aklum alleges Bargil's interview was 'entertainment for the public'.
- Bargil posted a legal document she says compels Aklum to grant the divorce.
Former "Big Brother" contestants Sapir Bargil and Avraham Aklum, who separated a year and a half ago, are engaged in a public dispute over their divorce proceedings and financial settlements. Bargil claims Aklum is withholding her get (religious divorce document) for 18 months, hindering her personal plans, including having children. She insists the divorce should be granted independently of any financial disagreements, stating, "There is no financial issue here. It's purely a get, and that's it." Bargil believes financial matters should be handled separately and that the get should not be used as a bargaining chip.
Bargil also alleged that Aklum missed a court hearing scheduled last month and publicly appealed to him during an interview, asking why he was preventing her divorce. To support her claims, she posted a screenshot of a legal document on Instagram, which she stated compels Aklum to grant her the divorce promptly.
Aklum, however, presented a different narrative, calling Bargil's interview "entertainment for the public." He stated that a legal battle over assets worth "millions of shekels" is ongoing, involving the division of finances and the return of property from their shared apartment. He pointed out that a lawsuit for the payment of the ketubah (marriage contract dowry) is also proceeding, contradicting Bargil's assertion of no financial dispute.
Aklum also listed items he claims have not been returned from their apartment, including appliances and furniture, emphasizing their significant value. He contrasted Bargil's public statements with the actual legal proceedings, questioning her motives. The dispute highlights a fundamental disagreement on whether financial matters are intrinsically linked to the divorce process, with Bargil seeking separation and Aklum asserting their interconnectedness.
Mentioned