Ex-AG Mandelblit Testifies on Police Contact with Journalist in Netanyahu Trial
Translated & summarized from Globes by baba
Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit testified in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trial, confirming he asked police to cease contact with journalist Ben Caspit due to concerns about the journalist directing the investigation. Mandelblit also stated Netanyahu was not explicitly warned about bribery charges in initial questioning for Case 4000, despite the eventual indictment. The defense argued the indictment was politically motivated, while the prosecution maintained their considerations were objective.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Former AG Mandelblit testified police should not use journalists as investigative "extended arms".
- Mandelblit confirmed he requested police stop contact with journalist Ben Caspit.
- Mandelblit stated Netanyahu was not warned of bribery charges in initial Case 4000 questioning.
- Defense lawyer Haddad presented evidence of police questioning journalist Caspit before AG approval.
- Mandelblit suspected leaks aimed to pressure the investigation into Netanyahu.
- Prosecutor argued the indictment was based on objective considerations, not political motives.
Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit continued his testimony on Wednesday in the Jerusalem District Court as part of the criminal trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This marked the fourth day of Mandelblit's testimony, called by the defense.
During his testimony, Mandelblit addressed allegations that investigative actions were taken without his approval and discussed leaks intended to pressure the investigation. Netanyahu's lawyer, Amit Haddad, presented evidence that the first approval Mandelblit gave for examining Case 1000 was on June 26, 2016, but police had already taken a detailed statement from journalist Ben Caspit in April of that year. Mandelblit stated that a police investigator should not use a journalist as an "extended arm" for investigations and that such proactive contact requires his approval. He confirmed he had requested to stop the contact with Caspit, expressing a "discomforting feeling" that Caspit was directing the police rather than being investigated.
Mandelblit also confirmed his suspicion of leaks from the prosecution or police, stating he suspected "mainly one person" but lacked proof. He believed these leaks aimed to pressure the investigation into the Prime Minister and that he tried to verify this in numerous discussions, wanting to be particularly cautious and monitor the case.
Regarding the investigation into Case 4000, Mandelblit testified that Netanyahu was not explicitly warned about bribery charges during the initial investigation, despite eventually being indicted for bribery along with fraud and breach of trust. The initial warning notice did not include the word "bribery." Mandelblit explained that the wording was intentionally ambiguous to allow for discretion between bribery and breach of trust, stating the phrasing was more suited to breach of trust but could lead to other conclusions. Lawyer Haddad emphasized that Netanyahu was never warned about bribery, a fact Mandelblit confirmed.
Prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh objected to defense claims that the indictment was filed to effect a change in government, asserting that the prosecution's considerations were objective and that the team comprised individuals from across Israeli society with extensive experience. Judge Moshe Bar-Am commented that he would not overlook a case where a prosecutor filed an indictment out of hatred for the Prime Minister, though Tirosh insisted the prosecution's motives were proper.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
