Blue and White's Number 2 Explains Party's Election Withdrawal
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
Pnina Tamano-Shata, Number 2 in the Blue and White party, stated that the party's withdrawal from the upcoming Knesset elections was a difficult but necessary decision for the good of the nation. She explained that the party prioritized Israel's future and the responsibility to ensure votes were not wasted. Tamano-Shata expressed full support for party chairman Benny Gantz, praising his integrity and commitment to Israel. The decision was made when it became clear the party might not pass the electoral threshold.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Blue and White's Number 2, Pnina Tamano-Shata, called the party's election withdrawal a sad but necessary decision.
- Tamano-Shata stated that national decisions require courage and integrity for the public's good.
- She explained the withdrawal was due to the responsibility for Israel's future and wasted votes.
- Tamano-Shata expressed full support for party chairman Benny Gantz, praising his integrity.
- The party decided to withdraw when it appeared they might not pass the electoral threshold.
Pnina Tamano-Shata, the second-highest-ranking official in the Blue and White party, expressed that the decision to withdraw from the upcoming Knesset elections was a difficult but necessary one for the good of the nation. She stated that while it was a sad day for her and the party, tough national decisions require courage and integrity towards the public. Tamano-Shata, who has served in the Knesset since 2018 and previously as Minister of Aliyah and Integration, remained loyal to party chairman Benny Gantz despite low expectations of crossing the electoral threshold.
She explained that the party's withdrawal was a difficult but correct decision at this time, and she fully supports it. Although they desired to continue their work in a state-oriented, professional, and unifying manner, the responsibility for Israel's future necessitated seeing the bigger picture and making such choices, even when their vision felt right. Tamano-Shata emphasized that sometimes one must know when to stop for the greater good.
Tamano-Shata conveyed her love for the people of Israel and her commitment to improving the country, stating that a just and egalitarian Israel that sees everyone is a beautiful and good Israel. She praised Gantz's integrity, dedication, and love for the country, noting his consistent emphasis on "Israel before everything." She highlighted his efforts to unite the nation, especially after October 7th, understanding that Israel's resilience, security, and future depend on unity.
She chose to continue with Gantz despite difficult times, members leaving, and alternative offers, expressing gratitude and appreciation for him and their partnership. Tamano-Shata affirmed her belief that Israel was always his priority, and the decision to withdraw reflects this commitment. The party decided to withdraw when it became clear that their supporters' votes would be wasted, and their responsibility was to allow those who trusted them to vote for representatives who could serve them in the Knesset, even at the cost of their own participation this time.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Centre 8Right 6Haredi 1Other 4
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
