Court Rules No Evidence Against Two in Benyahu Razi Murder Case
Translated & summarized from Channel 13 by baba
The Jerusalem District Court determined there is insufficient evidence to prosecute Agam Zarfati and Shilat Huta for the murder of Benyahu Razi. The court has referred the defendants for a probation report to consider their release. Attorneys for Zarfati stated the court accepted their argument that she was not involved in planning the murder. The defense also raised concerns about Zarfati's alleged mistreatment by the Prison Service.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- The Jerusalem District Court found insufficient evidence against Agam Zarfati and Shilat Huta for the murder of Benyahu Razi.
- The court referred both defendants for a probation service report to examine their release.
- Zarfati's attorneys argued she was not involved in planning the murder, a claim the court accepted.
- The prosecution's position was rejected by the court.
- Zarfati's legal team reported she suffered harsh treatment from the Prison Service during her detention.
The Jerusalem District Court ruled on Monday that there is insufficient evidence to support the murder charges against Agam Zarfati and Shilat Huta in the case of Benyahu Razi's death. Attorneys Roi Politi and Omri Stern, representing Zarfati from the Public Defense, announced the court's decision. Following the ruling, the court has referred both defendants for a probation service report to assess their potential release. The defense attorneys stated that the court accepted their arguments that Zarfati was not involved in planning the murder and did not wish for the deceased's death, rejecting the prosecution's stance. They also highlighted the harsh and humiliating treatment Zarfati has allegedly endured from the Prison Service (Shabas) since her arrest, expressing hope for her release to alternative detention soon and for fair treatment while under Shabas's care.
Mentioned
