Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 2

Netanyahu Unveils New Security Doctrine, Discusses Turkey, Russia, and Iran

11 developments

Kan NewsPolitics

Netanyahu's Security Doctrine Lacks Official Government Approval

Translated & summarized from Kan News by baba

PublicNeutral tone

Hebrew · Sole source

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's "Israel's Security Doctrine" has not been formally approved by the Israeli government or cabinet, according to former committee chairmen. The doctrine, which outlines principles like preemptive strikes and defense independence, lacks public record of official endorsement. The State Comptroller previously identified the absence of an approved national security doctrine as a long-standing failure. Officials from the Prime Minister's office stated that such doctrines serve as systemic directives and are presented as guidance, not requiring formal approval.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Prime Minister Netanyahu's security doctrine has not been approved by the Israeli government or cabinet.
  • Former committee chairmen Yuli Edelstein and Ram Ben Barak stated the document is the PM's vision, not Israel's.
  • The doctrine's principles include preemptive strikes and expanding independence in munitions production.
  • The State Comptroller previously called the lack of an approved national security doctrine a "long-standing failure."
  • PM's office claims doctrines are systemic directives, not individual decisions requiring approval.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recently presented "Israel's Security Doctrine" has not received formal approval from the Israeli government or cabinet, according to former chairmen of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Yuli Edelstein and Ram Ben Barak. They asserted that the document published might represent the Prime Minister's personal security vision, but not that of the State of Israel. Netanyahu's office had described the document as "the security doctrine of the State of Israel," outlining principles such as prioritizing preemption and offense over containment and defense, preemptive strikes against emerging threats, strengthening home front defense, and expanding independence in munitions production. However, no public record of a government or cabinet decision approving this doctrine has been found.

National security doctrines are crucial as they are intended to guide the development and operation of military forces, set priorities, and connect political objectives with the defense system's budgets and capabilities. The State Comptroller, Matanyahu Engelman, stated in a November 2025 report that the lack of an officially approved national security doctrine by the government or cabinet has been a "long-standing failure of the political echelon." This criticism also extended to Netanyahu himself, who initiated a similar process in 2017-2018 but failed to complete the approval or secure a binding decision on resource allocation.

The Comptroller's report also criticized the National Security Council for not bringing an updated doctrine to the cabinet for discussion and decision. The report detailed six previous attempts to formulate a doctrine between 1998 and 2021, involving various defense ministers and officials. In June 2025, the National Security Strategy Law was enacted, initiated by Yuli Edelstein and Gadi Eisenkot, establishing a procedure for developing a strategy upon the formation of a new government and its approval within five months, with the government or cabinet holding the authority to approve it.

Sources in the Prime Minister's office responded by stating that a security doctrine is a systemic directive for defense bodies on force building and operation, not an individual decision. They explained that such doctrines have never been brought for approval but are presented as a summary by the Prime Minister in the cabinet and as guidance to the defense establishment, as was done in this instance. They added that resources are allocated within an overall defense budget framework, not specifically for each component of the doctrine.

Kan NewsCentre · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire