Iran Missile Attack on US Midterms Predicted, Preempted
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
A hypothetical Iranian missile attack on the eve of US midterm elections, targeting the US, Israel, and Europe, was predicted and likely preempted by US-Israeli coordination. The article suggests Iran planned the strike to cripple President Trump's administration and ensure his election defeat. However, awareness of the plot by the US and Israel provided them with opportunities to act. The author implies a preemptive strike against Iran is imminent, before the elections.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Iran allegedly planned a massive missile attack on the US, Israel, and Europe on the eve of US midterm elections.
- The attack aimed to disrupt the elections and ensure President Trump's defeat, according to the article.
- The article suggests the US and Israel were aware of the plot and likely coordinated to preempt it.
- The author compares the Iranian regime's ruthlessness to Stalin's and warns against repeating past mistakes.
- A preemptive strike against Iran by the US and Israel is implied to be imminent.
- The hypothetical attack would have caused global chaos, including a surge in oil prices and closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
A hypothetical Iranian missile attack targeting the United States on the eve of the midterm elections, which would have devastated American soldiers and civilians in the Persian Gulf, Europe, and Israel, is presented as a scenario that was averted. The article posits that Iran, under its clerical regime, intended to launch a massive missile strike from sites in the Zagros Mountains, Tabriz, and Tehran, aiming to disrupt the elections and cripple President Donald Trump's administration. This attack, described as the deadliest in history, was allegedly timed to coincide with the US elections to ensure Trump's defeat, thereby neutralizing the "Great Satan" and its ally, the "Little Satan" (Israel).
The author suggests that such an attack would have caused widespread chaos, a surge in oil prices, and international demands for Trump to cease hostilities. It would have also led to warnings for US citizens to avoid public gatherings due to Iranian death squads operating within the country. The predicted outcome included Democratic control of Congress and the Senate, leaving Trump a "lame duck." Following this, Iran would have closed the Strait of Hormuz and dictated terms for negotiations.
However, the article argues that this scenario was likely prevented because both the US and Israel were aware of Iran's intentions. The author analyzes the situation through game theory, suggesting that Iran's only opportune moment to strike would be before the US elections, as any other timing would result in its destruction without significant damage to Trump. Conversely, the US and Israel, knowing an attack was imminent, now possess multiple opportunities to act.
The piece contrasts the Iranian regime with Joseph Stalin, highlighting their ruthlessness and disregard for their own citizens' lives in pursuit of a nuclear bomb. It asserts that President Trump, unlike Roosevelt and Churchill in their dealings with Stalin, will not repeat past mistakes. The article concludes by stating that recent months have seen extensive, covert preparations and perfect coordination between the US and Israel, implying that the Iranian regime's "religious cannibalism" and aspirations will be met by a preemptive strike from the US and Israel before the midterm elections.
Mentioned
