Amit Segal Responds to Opposition Infighting
Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba
Political commentator Amit Segal addressed the conflict between Avigdor Lieberman and Gadi Eisenkot, linking Lieberman's refusal to back a minority government to his criticism. Segal analyzed Lieberman's statement as a significant blow to Eisenkot's government formation plan. He suggested Lieberman's actions might be aimed at increasing his post-election bargaining power.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Amit Segal linked Avigdor Lieberman's refusal to support a minority government with his criticism of Gadi Eisenkot.
- Segal described Lieberman's statement as "the mother of all bombs" on Eisenkot's government plan.
- The plan involved forming a government with 58 mandates, potentially excluding Arab parties.
- Segal suggested Lieberman's move could be driven by poll data and right-wing voter concerns.
- Lieberman vowed to vote against such a government, potentially impacting post-election negotiations.
Political commentator Amit Segal has weighed in on the dramatic clash between Yisrael Beiteinu Chairman Avigdor Lieberman and Gadi Eisenkot, linking Lieberman's recent statement refusing to support a minority government with his criticism of Eisenkot. Segal noted on his Telegram channel that some had speculated Lieberman's move might be coordinated with Eisenkot, but stated, "Well, no."
Segal analyzed the political implications of Lieberman's declaration on Channel 12 News's main broadcast. He described Lieberman's statement as "the mother of all bombs" on Eisenkot's plan to form a government with 58 mandates, potentially excluding Arab parties or some Haredi factions. Segal explained that politicians' pre-election statements are often driven by poll data and the need to address problematic trends, such as right-wing voters' concerns about Ra'am and the Joint List gaining influence.
Segal emphasized that Lieberman went beyond merely stating he would not support such a government, declaring he would vote against it. If Lieberman upholds this promise, it could jeopardize the formation of a minority government even after elections. Senior figures within the bloc reportedly expressed that Lieberman's actions were not coordinated with them and are potentially damaging. They are questioning whether Lieberman is attempting to increase his leverage for post-election negotiations, possibly demanding the premiership as compensation.
Mentioned
