Nobel Laureate Navi Pillay Slams Trump Sanctions on ICC, Defends Actions
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Navi Pillay condemned U.S. sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) as illegal and a response to President Trump not winning the award. Pillay, who previously led a UN commission accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza, also criticized the U.S. for hypocrisy regarding ICC actions against leaders. She was offended by Israeli comparisons of her to Nazi propaganda minister Josef Goebbels. Pillay expressed confidence that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for whom the ICC has issued an arrest warrant, will eventually face trial.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Nobel laureate Navi Pillay called U.S. sanctions on the ICC illegal and a reaction to President Trump's Nobel snub.
- Pillay accused the U.S. of hypocrisy for its differing reactions to ICC warrants against leaders.
- Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu called Pillay prejudiced, and the Foreign Ministry compared her to Josef Goebbels.
- Pillay stated she was offended by the Goebbels comparison, noting his responsibility for thousands of deaths.
- Pillay believes Prime Minister Netanyahu will eventually face trial at the ICC despite current political obstacles.
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Navi Pillay sharply criticized U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday for imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. Pillay, an 85-year-old South African jurist, called the sanctions illegal in an interview with AFP, suggesting their timing, announced shortly after her Nobel win, was a reaction to Trump not receiving the award himself.
Pillay advised Trump to consult his legal advisors on international law and the independence of international courts. She stated that the sanctions, which target the ICC's infrastructure, banking services, and international dealings, are an illegal attempt to undermine its autonomy and function. The U.S. administration has given service providers six months to cease operations with the court. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio vowed to dismantle the ICC "brick by brick," citing opposition to its jurisdiction over non-member states' citizens and leaders.
The U.S. administration is particularly angered by the ICC's decision to issue an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on suspicion of war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza war. Both Israel and the U.S. reject the ICC's jurisdiction over Israel, as it is not a member state.
Pillay accused Washington of hypocrisy, pointing out the differing U.S. administrations' reactions to ICC decisions. She noted that previous administrations welcomed the arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin but sought to cripple the court when it acted against an Israeli leader, calling it "selectivity" and "double standards."
Pillay also addressed the strong reactions in Israel to her Nobel Prize. She previously headed a UN commission that determined Israel committed genocide in Gaza, a finding Israel rejected as biased. Netanyahu called Pillay "prejudiced," and Israel's Foreign Ministry accused her of legitimizing hatred and prejudice against Israel, comparing her to Josef Goebbels and stating he would applaud her "greatest lie of the 21st century" from hell.
Pillay found the comparison to Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister responsible for thousands of deaths, "offensive and insulting." Despite her criticism of Netanyahu, she acknowledged that arresting him to stand trial at the ICC is unlikely in the current political climate but expressed confidence it would happen eventually. Pillay, a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and ICC judge, is still processing her Nobel win and plans to use the prize money to advance social causes, potentially in her native South Africa.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Only Ynet so far.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
