Knesset Speaker Ohana Says He'd Allow Replacement If 61-Member Majority Demands It
Translated & summarized from Haaretz by baba
Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana said he would allow his replacement if 61 lawmakers demand it after the elections, but urged voters to prevent this. He indicated he would not allow the situation to reach the High Court of Justice again, unlike former Speaker Yuli Edelstein. Edelstein resigned in 2020 rather than comply with a court order to convene the plenum for a vote on a new speaker. Ohana, then Justice Minister, had encouraged Edelstein to defy the court.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana stated he would allow his replacement if 61 lawmakers demand it after elections.
- Ohana urged voters to prevent his replacement, noting Arab MKs would likely be part of the majority.
- He vowed not to let the situation reach the High Court of Justice, unlike Yuli Edelstein.
- In 2020, then-Speaker Edelstein resigned rather than obey a High Court order to convene the plenum.
- Ohana, as Justice Minister, had encouraged Edelstein to defy the court's ruling.
- The High Court ruled Edelstein's refusal to convene the plenum undermined democratic principles.
Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana stated on Monday that he would permit his replacement if a majority of 61 lawmakers demands it after the upcoming elections. However, speaking at a Ynet conference, he urged Israeli citizens to prevent such a scenario through their votes, noting that Arab Knesset members would likely be part of such a majority. "If the Speaker of the Knesset is replaced based on these votes, what is there to say," he added.
Ohana addressed the possibility of refusing to convene the plenum for a vote to replace him, a situation previously encountered with former Speaker Yuli Edelstein. He asserted that he would not allow such a process to reach the High Court of Justice again, stating, "We are law-abiding and always have been."
In March 2020, Edelstein, then also Speaker and a Likud member, refused to convene the plenum to elect a permanent speaker, despite 61 Knesset members supporting his replacement. Edelstein argued against electing a permanent speaker before the future coalition's composition was clear. The High Court of Justice unanimously ruled that he must hold the vote by March 25, with then-Supreme Court President Esther Hayut stating that the continued refusal undermined democratic principles.
At the time, Ohana, serving as Justice Minister, encouraged Edelstein to defy the court even before its ruling. When the court demanded Edelstein state whether he would convene the plenum, Ohana tweeted, "If I were the Speaker of the Knesset, I would answer: no." Edelstein ultimately resigned rather than comply with the court's order, writing to the judges that "a matter of conscience does not allow me to comply with your ruling."
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Centre 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.