Protest Leader Slams Political Commentator Amidst Data Leak Scandal
Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba
Protest leader Shikma Bressler accused Channel 12 commentator Amit Segal of being a mouthpiece following a large leak of WhatsApp messages from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's advisor, Yonatan Uriach. The leak included conversations between Uriach and Segal, sparking debate about journalist-government relations. Segal defended the exchanges as standard practice but condemned the illegal breach of privacy.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Protest leader Shikma Bressler criticized commentator Amit Segal over leaked messages from PM Netanyahu's advisor.
- The leak involved WhatsApp conversations between advisor Yonatan Uriach and journalist Amit Segal.
- Bressler questioned Segal's impartiality, calling him a "mouthpiece" in a social media post.
- The data breach exposed communications between Uriach and various political and media figures.
- Segal described the exchanges as normal source-reporter interactions but condemned the illegal leak.
Protest leader Shikma Bressler has sharply criticized Channel 12 political commentator Amit Segal following a major leak of WhatsApp messages belonging to Yonatan Uriach, a close advisor to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Bressler, a prominent figure in the "Black Flags" protest movement, posted a pointed response on social media after Uriach's leaked communications included exchanges with Segal. She questioned Segal's role, asking, "So now it's clear to everyone that he is a 'Shofar' Segal?" (a play on words combining "shofar," a ram's horn, and Segal's name, implying he is a mouthpiece).
The controversy erupted due to a significant security breach on Uriach's phone, which led to the widespread dissemination of his private conversations. The leaked messages involved senior officials in the Prime Minister's Office, politicians, Likud party members, and journalists, including Segal. This incident has fueled a heated debate regarding the relationship dynamics between government officials and senior journalists.
During a discussion on Channel 12, Segal addressed the leak, characterizing such exchanges as a common practice of information and opinion sharing between sources and reporters across all political parties. He emphasized that illegally accessing and distributing private phone content is a criminal act, stating he would pursue legal action if his own device were compromised. The article notes that due to privacy laws, the specific content of the leaked personal messages will not be published.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Right 3Haredi 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
