Ex-AG Mandelblit Admits Approving Serious Investigations He Didn't Authorize
Translated & summarized from JDN by baba
Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit testified in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trial, admitting to serious investigative actions he did not approve, including the wiretapping of Natan Eshel, which he called "improper." He described an investigative tactic against state witness Nir Hefetz as "improper and incorrect" but chose to review it via documents to protect the trial. Mandelblit also stated he did not authorize any investigation into Netanyahu concerning the submarine affair, as no suspicion was identified.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Former AG Avichai Mandelblit admitted approving serious investigative actions he did not authorize in the Netanyahu trial.
- Mandelblit testified that the wiretapping of Netanyahu confidant Natan Eshel "infuriated" him, and he ordered it stopped.
- He described an investigative maneuver against state witness Nir Hefetz as "improper and incorrect" but chose document review over investigation.
- Mandelblit stated he did not authorize any investigation into Netanyahu regarding the submarine affair.
- The former AG emphasized his request for oversight on key actions due to the sensitivity of the Prime Minister's investigations.
- Mandelblit described police investigators as "galloping horses" requiring supervision.
Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit testified Sunday in the trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, admitting that serious investigative actions were taken without his explicit approval. Mandelblit stated that the wiretapping of Netanyahu confidant Natan Eshel angered him, and he ordered it stopped. He also described an investigative maneuver against state witness Nir Hefetz as "improper and incorrect," but explained he chose to investigate it through documents to avoid harming the legal proceedings.
Mandelblit was called by the defense, which seeks to clarify which investigative actions he approved, what information he received, and whether investigators exceeded his directives. He emphasized that while not every action required his approval, he requested oversight on key actions due to the sensitivity of investigations involving the Prime Minister. He described the police as "galloping horses" that try to exhaust suspicions, necessitating supervision from the prosecution and the Attorney General, especially in a Prime Minister's case.
Regarding the wiretapping of Eshel, Mandelblit testified, "This action infuriated me," and he demanded to know if Eshel was personally linked to the offenses under investigation. He ordered the wiretapping stopped unless such a link existed, stating that listening in on the Prime Minister's family was unacceptable. He also noted that while he did not recall specific uses of search warrants for unauthorized purposes or advanced surveillance technology like Pegasus, he had requested that future sensitive actions be brought to him in advance.
Concerning the Hefetz affair, Mandelblit acknowledged "improper things happened" but stopped short of calling them illegal. He explained that after learning about the Hefetz maneuver, he discussed whether to refer the matter to the Police Internal Investigations Department or conduct his own inquiry. Fearing that an investigation involving the involved parties could lead to witness collusion and prejudice the trial, he opted to examine the matter through documents, prioritizing the proper conduct of the trial over pursuing disciplinary action against the investigators.
Mandelblit also addressed the submarine affair, stating he did not authorize any investigation into Netanyahu regarding it, as he "did not identify any suspicion against the Prime Minister in this case." He clarified that if evidence warranting it had emerged later, an investigation would have been opened. The prosecution noted that the Attorney General's testimony was an "exception to exceptions," and they did not object due to the unique circumstances surrounding approvals for opening investigations.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Centre 1Right 5Haredi 3Arab 2Other 5
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
