Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

WallaSports

Ex-Striker Alon Mizrahi Spars With Commentator Over National Team's Past and Present

Translated & summarized from Walla by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · Sole source

Former Israeli national team striker Alon Mizrahi clashed with commentator Uri Azen on air, arguing current players lack the talent and commitment of his generation. Azen defended the current team, citing youth successes and questioning Mizrahi's generation's own failures to qualify for major tournaments.

The story in 6 lines · by baba

  • Alon Mizrahi debated Uri Azen on Israeli national football team's past vs. present.
  • Mizrahi claimed current stars like Gloukh and Solomon are inferior to Revivo and Berkovich.
  • He cited his generation's past achievement of second place in a qualifying group.
  • Azen countered that Mizrahi's generation also failed to qualify for major tournaments.
  • Mizrahi accused current players of lacking "soul" and commitment.
  • Azen defended the current team and highlighted youth successes.

Former Israel national team striker Alon Mizrahi engaged in a heated on-air debate with sports commentator Uri Azen regarding the current generation of Israeli footballers compared to previous eras. Mizrahi, appearing on 103FM radio prior to the team's 1-1 draw with Ireland, asserted that current stars like Oskar Gloukh and Manor Solomon do not possess the same level of talent as past players such as Haim Revivo and Eyal Berkovich.

Mizrahi argued that while the current players are talented, they lack the caliber of his generation, citing the national team's past achievement of reaching second place in a European Championship qualifying group under coach Shlomo Sharf in 1992. He contrasted this with the current team's struggles, suggesting that the players of his era would have easily qualified for major tournaments if they played today.

Azen countered Mizrahi's claims, pointing out that Mizrahi's generation also failed to qualify for major tournaments and that their notable achievement came against a weak Austrian team. He argued that the current players are doing their best and that comparing generations is unproductive, emphasizing that the modern game is different and that the youth team's success in reaching the U-20 World Cup semifinals and the U-21 Euros semifinals should be acknowledged.

Mizrahi further contended that today's players lack the "soul" and commitment, suggesting they receive money too easily and are less dedicated than players of his time, who he claimed would play through injuries. Azen strongly rejected this, accusing Mizrahi of disrespecting the current players and questioning why Mizrahi's own generation did not achieve more, referencing a significant loss they suffered in a playoff.

The debate also touched upon the current team's qualification system, with Azen noting that finishing second in a group no longer guarantees automatic qualification, a point Mizrahi seemed to overlook. The exchange highlighted a stark difference in perspective on the historical performance and current capabilities of the Israeli national football team.

WallaCentre · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

SportsTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire