Supreme Court Justices Suggest Politician Withdraw to Avoid Disqualification
Translated & summarized from Hamal by baba
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Supreme Court justices suggested Sami Abu Shehadeh withdraw candidacy to avoid disqualification.
- Abu Shehadeh faces disqualification for calling Oct 7th attack a 'historic event'.
- Attorney General and State Prosecutor support Abu Shehadeh's disqualification.
- Clashes occurred outside court between Abu Shehadeh supporters and Minister Ben-Gvir.
- MKs from Joint List also clashed with Minister Ben-Gvir at the court.
- MK Rothman criticized the court's suggestion to Abu Shehadeh.
The Israeli Supreme Court heard arguments on Thursday regarding the disqualification of candidates and lists for the upcoming elections. A nine-judge panel considered the cases of Sami Abu Shehadeh, Ofer Cassif, the Joint List, and Ra'am. The central focus was on Sami Abu Shehadeh, chairman of the Balad party, who was disqualified by the Central Elections Committee following remarks made after the October 7th Hamas attack. The push for his disqualification also came from the Attorney General and the State Prosecutor, who believe his candidacy should be blocked. The head of the Elections Committee, Deputy Supreme Court President Noam Sohlberg, also supported the disqualification.
During the hearing, Justice Yitzhak Amit suggested to Abu Shehadeh that he withdraw his candidacy to avoid a ruling that would prohibit him from running. Amit stated that there was a consensus among the judges that Abu Shehadeh's writings were abhorrent and that the likely outcome would be upholding the disqualification. He recommended that Abu Shehadeh consider whether to proceed with his candidacy or withdraw, which would render a reasoned judgment unnecessary.
Outside the court, supporters of Balad clashed with Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir, who attended the hearing for a disqualification request filed by his party, Otzma Yehudit. Ben-Gvir called the protesters "terror supporters." Inside the court premises, a confrontation occurred between Ben-Gvir, MK Ahmad Tibi, MK Yousef Jabareen, and MK Ofer Cassif. Ben-Gvir referred to them as "a gang of terrorists," while Tibi responded cryptically. Jabareen called Ben-Gvir a "fascist," and Cassif called him a "neo-Nazi."
The disqualification request is primarily based on an article Abu Shehadeh published on October 8, 2023, when the full extent of the Hamas attack was still unfolding. In the article, Abu Shehadeh described the events as a "historic event" with military, political, and strategic significance. The Attorney General and State Prosecutor argued that these statements constituted support for Hamas's armed struggle against Israel, falling under the grounds for disqualification stipulated by law. This stance is notable as the state's legal representatives opposed the disqualification of MK Ofer Cassif, Ra'am, and the Joint List.
Abu Shehadeh countered that at the time of writing, he was unaware of the full scale of the massacre and civilian casualties, and that he has historically opposed harming civilians. Minister Ben-Gvir questioned Abu Shehadeh's claims of ignorance, pointing to televised images of the atrocities and asking why he had not retracted his statement. Chairman of the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, MK Simcha Rothman, criticized Justice Amit's suggestion to Abu Shehadeh, calling it contrary to legal principles and public trial requirements.
Read the original at HamalMentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
