Court Orders Ex-Couple to Repay Mother-in-Law $380,000
Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba
An Israeli court has ordered a former couple to repay 380,000 shekels to the man's mother, ruling that funds transferred during their marriage were loans, not gifts. The ex-daughter-in-law's claims of repayment and the remainder being a gift were dismissed due to lack of evidence and inconsistencies.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Court orders ex-couple to repay mother-in-law 380,000 shekels.
- Funds were deemed loans, not gifts, due to lack of evidence.
- Ex-daughter-in-law's testimony found unreliable by the judge.
- Ruling emphasizes need for documented financial agreements.
- Ex-daughter-in-law faces additional costs and legal fees.
A family dispute concluded this week with a court ruling ordering a former couple to return 380,000 shekels to the man's mother. The mother claimed the funds, transferred during the couple's marriage, were loans conditional on repayment in case of separation. The former daughter-in-law argued that part of the money had already been repaid and the remainder was a gift.
According to the report, the mother provided two separate sums: 200,000 shekels for a down payment on a home and 180,000 shekels to cover bank loans and provide additional financial assistance. She testified that both transfers were explicitly understood as loans to be repaid upon divorce.
Following the couple's separation, the mother sued for the full amount. While the son supported his mother's account, the ex-daughter-in-law presented a different narrative. She asserted that the first sum of 200,000 shekels was repaid in cash during visits to her mother-in-law, and the remaining 180,000 shekels was a gift.
Judge Hila Gurevitch Ovadia found significant inconsistencies in the ex-daughter-in-law's testimony, noting she did not know her mother-in-law's address during the period she claimed to have made cash payments. This, along with a lack of documentation for the alleged repayments, led the court to deem her account unreliable.
The court ruled the former couple jointly liable for the full 380,000 shekel repayment. The ex-daughter-in-law was also ordered to pay 2,500 shekels in court costs and approximately 35,000 shekels in legal fees.
The ex-daughter-in-law's legal representative stated she is only responsible for half the amount and that the lawsuit was unnecessary. Conversely, the mother's lawyer emphasized that her documentation clearly proved the transfers were loans. The ruling highlights the importance of written documentation for family financial transfers, especially amid rising divorce rates, advising clear labeling of gifts versus loans.
Mentioned
