Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Behadrei HaredimPolitics

Top Legal Officials Urge Supreme Court to Disqualify Arab Israeli Lawmaker

Translated & summarized from Behadrei Haredim by baba

ReligiousCharged tone

Hebrew · 19 newsrooms covering

Israel's Attorney General and State Prosecutor are asking the Supreme Court to disqualify Balad party chairman Sami Abu Shehadeh from running for Knesset due to his alleged support for armed struggle against Israel, especially after the October 7th attacks. The Otzma Yehudit party has also submitted new evidence to the court.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Top legal officials urge Supreme Court to disqualify lawmaker Sami Abu Shehadeh.
  • Disqualification sought over alleged support for armed struggle against Israel.
  • Legal argument focuses on article published day after October 7th attacks.
  • Abu Shehadeh's explanations for his statements were dismissed as insufficient.
  • Otzma Yehudit party submitted new video and podcast evidence.
Top Legal Officials Urge Supreme Court to Disqualify Arab Israeli Lawmaker
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's Attorney General and State Prosecutor have formally requested the Supreme Court to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh, chairman of the Balad party, from running for the Knesset. The legal officials cited his support for armed struggle against Israel, particularly in the context of the October 7th Hamas attacks.

This represents a more definitive stance than previously presented to the Central Elections Committee, where the Attorney General had initially refrained from a final conclusion on disqualification. The new position, submitted ahead of Thursday's Supreme Court hearing, clearly advocates for Abu Shehadeh's removal from the electoral race.

The core of the legal argument centers on an article Abu Shehadeh published on October 8, 2023, the day after the Hamas assault began. The Attorney General and State Prosecutor contend that the article expresses support for Hamas's armed conflict with Israel, deeming his behavior central to the grounds for disqualification stipulated in Israel's Basic Law: The Knesset. They emphasized the extreme circumstances and timing of this alleged support.

Furthermore, the legal officials dismissed Abu Shehadeh's subsequent explanations for his statements as "evasive, partial, and not addressing the central allegations." They argue his justifications for the "harsh remarks" in his October 8th article, along with other presented evidence and his overall conduct, are insufficient.

In parallel, the Otzma Yehudit party filed an unusual request with the Supreme Court to introduce new evidence before Thursday's hearing. The party claims to have found additional proof, including a video posted by Abu Shehadeh three days after the October 7th massacre, where he allegedly describes the events as a "significant political-strategic event" without condemning the attacks or praising the "martyrs" and Negev residents. Otzma Yehudit also submitted a podcast transcript where Abu Shehadeh reportedly referred to Hamas's war as "steadfastness" and "legendary." Another piece of evidence is a video from a Balad conference where Abu Shehadeh downplayed the significance of October 7th, stating "history did not begin on October 7th" and that it was a result of "the siege, the occupation, and the daily crimes."

Behadrei HaredimHaredi · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 24 outlets
First: Panet · Sep 29

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire