Don't Cancel Palestinian Elections, Urges Analyst
Palestinians are scheduled to hold legislative elections on November 28, marking a significant event after years without nationwide voting. However, concerns are mounting that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas may cancel the elections, a move he previously made in May 2021. Reported reasons include uncertainty over voting in East Jerusalem, practical difficulties in Gaza, internal political considerations, and the fear among established political forces of unfavorable outcomes.
The author argues that none of these reasons justify denying Palestinians their right to choose their leadership, emphasizing the deep legitimacy crisis within the Palestinian political system, which currently operates without a renewed democratic mandate. The split between the West Bank and Gaza, and the perceived ineffectiveness and detachment of Fatah and Hamas, underscore the necessity of elections.
While acknowledging that elections can yield unpredictable results, potentially strengthening extremists, the author asserts they are the only legitimate way to refresh leadership, gauge public support, introduce new political forces, and establish a representative governing body. Canceling the elections would send a message that Palestinian institutions fear the public's will.
Specific challenges like voting in East Jerusalem, where Israel opposes Palestinian political activity, are acknowledged. However, the article stresses that Israeli objections should not grant a veto over Palestinian democracy. Alternative voting methods, including leveraging technology and international diplomatic missions, should be explored if Israel blocks traditional arrangements. Similarly, holding elections in Gaza, despite immense post-war difficulties, is crucial for political reunification and establishing a single legitimate governing authority.
The piece also highlights a potential shift in Palestinian politics, with growing frustration towards both Fatah and Hamas, leading to a significant segment of the population favoring neither. New movements, young leaders, and independent candidates are challenging the status quo, suggesting a potential for renewal. The author contends that elections are not meant to protect incumbents but to empower the public to change leadership.
Furthermore, the article posits that Israel has a vested interest in these elections. While the claim of "no Palestinian partner" may stem from genuine frustration, it is undermined by denying Palestinians the chance to elect a legitimate leadership. A democratically elected Palestinian leadership would possess greater political legitimacy to make difficult decisions, implement reforms, negotiate with Israel, and enforce agreements, which is essential for any future resolution.
The author concludes by urging the international community, particularly the US, Europe, and Arab nations, to clearly state that Palestinian elections must proceed. They should offer practical assistance for voting in Gaza and East Jerusalem, dispatch observers, support election institutions, and reject any attempts to cancel the process. While the November elections may not resolve the Palestinian national crisis, their cancellation would immediately deepen it, hindering the ability to build a state and perpetuating Israel's question of finding a partner.
