Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Arutz ShevaWorld

NYT Accused of Systematic Anti-Israel Bias in New Study

Translated & summarized from Arutz Sheva by baba

RightCharged tone

Hebrew · 5 newsrooms covering

A Yale study analyzing 1,559 articles found The New York Times systematically biased against Israel in its Gaza war coverage, a claim the newspaper denies.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Study claims NYT shows systematic anti-Israel bias.
  • 1,559 articles analyzed from Oct 2023 to June 2024.
  • NYT allegedly ignored Israeli victims, highlighted Gazan suffering.
  • Research claims paper minimized Hamas's role.
  • The New York Times denies the study's findings.

A new academic study claims The New York Times has systematically exhibited bias against Israel in its coverage of the Gaza war. The research, conducted by Professor Adiel Pinkas from Yale School of Management, analyzed 1,559 articles published by the newspaper between October 7, 2023, and June 7, 2024.

According to the study's findings, the newspaper largely ignored Israeli casualties and Palestinian violence that occurred after the initial Hamas attack. In contrast, the Times reportedly focused heavily on highlighting the suffering of Gazans. Pinkas stated that the analysis reveals a narrative that assigns almost exclusive responsibility to Israel for the conflict's continuation, while minimizing Hamas's role.

The research further alleges that the Times' reporting pattern omits significant details, such as Israeli victims after October 7, Hamas combatant casualties, and subsequent Palestinian violence. This selective reporting, the study contends, creates a clear framework casting Israel as the sole aggressor and Palestinians as passive victims.

Representatives for The New York Times have rejected the study's conclusions and allegations of bias. In a statement, the newspaper asserted that its coverage of the war has been conducted with exceptional accuracy and thoroughness, reporting on the conflict from all perspectives.

Arutz ShevaRight · Beit El

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

WorldTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire