Degel HaTorah Leadership Shakeup Unresolved Amidst Leaks
Translated & summarized from JDN by baba
Reports of MKs Moshe Gafni and Uri Maklev being removed from the Degel HaTorah Knesset list are unconfirmed, with senior officials stating no final decision has been made. Rabbinic authority Rabbi Moshe Hillel Hirsch has not approved the move, viewing the process as "bloodshed."
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Degel HaTorah leadership changes remain undecided despite media reports.
- Senior officials deny final decisions on MKs Gafni and Maklev's Knesset status.
- Rabbinic authority Rabbi Moshe Hillel Hirsch has not approved the proposed changes.
- The process is criticized for using leaks to create faits accomplis.
- The final list composition will be clear by Tuesday's candidate submission deadline.
Reports circulating that MK Yaakov Asher is set to become the chairman of Degel HaTorah, with MKs Moshe Gafni and Uri Maklev not being included in the upcoming Knesset list, do not reflect a final decision, according to senior movement officials. These sources stated that no decisive event occurred on Saturday night to finalize the move, suggesting the publications might be an attempt to establish facts on the ground, create a sense of inevitability, or generate counter-pressure from movement activists opposed to Gafni and Maklev's removal.
Furthermore, Rabbi Moshe Hillel Hirsch, a leading rabbinic authority, has not yet endorsed the move and has not given his approval. After significant pressure to address the issue, he decided not to intervene at this time. However, his position is that removing the two representatives is inappropriate currently, and he views the manner in which the process is unfolding as "bloodshed," a term used to describe internal strife.
According to the reported plan, MK Yaakov Asher would lead the movement, and MK Yitzchak Pindrus would remain on the list. Some within Degel HaTorah link Pindrus's retention to his association with Rabbi Hirsch's household. However, even this composition is not final and may undergo further changes.
The recent conduct has drawn severe criticism, with anonymous elements allegedly spreading briefings and leaks instead of facilitating an orderly and respectful decision. This approach is described as turning two veteran public representatives into targets in a public humiliation campaign. Even if a decision to replace them is ultimately made, the method of preparing the public and establishing facts through the media is deemed unworthy of a movement that claims to follow the guidance of Torah scholars.
The final picture is expected to emerge on Tuesday, the deadline for submitting candidate lists for the Knesset. Until then, any announcement regarding a definitive removal or a finalized list composition for Degel HaTorah should be treated with caution.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 5Right 2Haredi 3Arab 1Other 1
