Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

N12Health

Woman Sues Health Provider for Millions Over Delayed Cancer Diagnosis

Translated & summarized from N12 by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · Sole source

An Israeli woman is suing Clalit Health Services for NIS 2.5 million, alleging that doctors' negligence in explaining test results led to a five-year delay in diagnosing advanced rectal cancer, significantly impacting her prognosis.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Woman sues Clalit for NIS 2.5 million over delayed cancer diagnosis.
  • Lawsuit alleges doctors failed to explain test results or urgency of colonoscopy.
  • Multiple positive tests for occult blood were reportedly ignored.
  • Cancer discovered five years later, significantly reducing survival chances.
  • Medical experts criticize the clinical approach as superficial and negligent.

A woman is suing Clalit Health Services for up to 2.5 million shekels, alleging medical negligence led to a delayed diagnosis of advanced rectal cancer. The lawsuit claims that despite multiple positive results for occult blood in stool tests over five years, doctors failed to adequately explain the urgency and necessity of a colonoscopy. The woman, who was 54 at the time of her initial screening, was referred for the procedure twice but was not informed of the potential for malignancy.

According to the lawsuit filed in Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court, a third positive test result for occult blood was noted by a doctor who made a comment about "no phone response" and took no further action to contact the patient. It was only five years after her first screening that she underwent a colonoscopy, revealing a large tumor that had spread significantly.

Medical expert opinions attached to the suit state that the woman's survival rate in the next five years is only 40%. Experts argue that the family doctor did not fulfill their duty to inform the patient of the findings' severity and the need for the colonoscopy, calling the clinical approach "superficial." They contend that patients cannot be expected to interpret complex medical results without clear explanations from their physicians, and therefore, the woman cannot be considered to have refused the recommended tests.

Attorneys for the woman stated that doctors took "weak action" to contact her and gave up when initial attempts failed, leading to the cancer being diagnosed at a late stage and severely impacting her quality and life expectancy. Clalit Health Services responded that they recently received the lawsuit and will provide a full response within the legal proceedings.

N12Centre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

HealthTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 2 outlets
First: N12 · Sep 1

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Only N12 so far.

Open the Wire