Supreme Court President's Remark to Shin Bet Chief Sparks Outrage
Supreme Court President Isaac Amit has drawn sharp criticism online for his remarks to Shin Bet (General Security Service) chief David Zini during a hearing concerning Zini's demand to reveal the identities of petitioners opposing his appointment. Amit suggested Zini reconsider his demand, stating, "It is not certain that it will do him good."
The controversy arose after Zini requested the court declare the petitioners in contempt for refusing to fully disclose their identities. The petitioners, former Shin Bet officials, cited fears of retribution from Zini. Zini's camp, however, argued that it is a basic right for a litigant to know who is petitioning against them.
Online, many users and public figures interpreted Amit's statement as inappropriate, with some calling it "mafia-like talk" and a "mafia-like threat." Professor Moshe Cohen-Eliya criticized Amit, stating his remark was a "mafia-like threat" against Zini for insisting on his legal right to know the petitioners' identities. Cohen-Eliya described Amit as a symbol of the "complete corruption of the legal world in service of maintaining the old hegemony."
Attorney Ohad Shalom echoed the criticism, telling "Galei Yisrael" radio that Amit's phrasing sounded like a threat, not a legal recommendation. He noted that such phrasing is typically used by those involved in organized crime. The legal debate continues as the court must now decide whether to compel the petitioners to reveal their full names.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.