Gadi Eisenkot Open to Coalition With Likud, Rejects Haredi Parties Without Concessions
Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba
Yisrael Beiteinu chairman Gadi Eisenkot stated he would not rule out a coalition with the Likud party but rejected Haredi parties unless they agree to mandatory service. He stressed core principles for coalition partners and the importance of public trust in elections.
The story in 4 lines · by baba
- Gadi Eisenkot open to coalition with Likud.
- Haredi parties rejected unless they accept mandatory service.
- Coalition requires adherence to Jewish, democratic, liberal principles.
- Eisenkot emphasizes public trust in upcoming elections.
Gadi Eisenkot, chairman of the Yisrael Beiteinu party, stated in an interview with Channel 12 News that he would not rule out sitting in a coalition government with the Likud party. He explained his willingness to join forces with any party that adheres to three core principles: that Israel is a Jewish, democratic, and liberal state, upholds the values of the Declaration of Independence, and supports mandatory national service.
Eisenkot specifically addressed the Likud, describing it as a Zionist and liberal party, and therefore not an obstacle to coalition talks. However, he expressed a firm stance against the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) parties, stating he would only consider them for a coalition if they change their approach to mandatory military service.
Regarding the broader political landscape and potential leadership contenders, Eisenkot commented on the fragmented nature of the Netanyahu bloc and the growing centrist bloc. He acknowledged and respected the political positions of figures like Avigdor Liberman and Naftali Bennett, noting ongoing communication. Eisenkot reiterated his previous stance that the leader of the largest party should be the bloc's candidate but expressed understanding for the need to unite maximum support.
He outlined his campaign strategy as continuous public engagement across the country to persuade voters. Eisenkot emphasized the critical importance of public trust in future leadership, particularly in the upcoming elections, and expressed confidence that a clear electoral outcome would guide coalition formation.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Right 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
