Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Full coverage· Politics· Updated

Judges Consider Summoning Attorney General in Netanyahu Corruption Trial

Judges presiding over the corruption trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Jerusalem District Court have proposed summoning Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara to a hearing. The court expressed a desire to speak directly with the Attorney General regarding the specifics and conduct of the case.

3 newsrooms · 1 language · since

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to save this article and find it on your phone.

or use an email code

Judges Consider Summoning Attorney General in Netanyahu Corruption Trial
Illustration by baba

What happened

  1. 01Judges in the Jerusalem District Court proposed summoning Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara to a hearing in Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial.
  2. 02The defense for defendant Shaul Elovitch requested the Attorney General's presence in a closed-door session, citing irregularities in the evidence phase.
  3. 03Presiding Judge Shaham indicated that the court was already considering summoning the Attorney General before the defense made its formal request.
  4. 04The prosecution questioned the legal basis for summoning the Attorney General to the trial.
  5. 05Judge Friedman-Feldman defended the proposal by stating that there are many things in this trial that are not ordinary.
  6. 06The potential summons of the Attorney General relates to the ongoing Case 1000 proceedings against the Prime Minister.

The unusual proposal arose on Thursday after the defense team for defendant Shaul Elovitch requested the Attorney General be called to a closed-door session, citing irregularities discovered during the evidence phase. Presiding Judge Shaham indicated that the court had already been considering this step before the defense made its formal request, suggesting the defense might have opened a door that was already ajar.

The prosecution representative expressed reservations, questioning the legal basis for summoning the Attorney General. In response to the prosecution's objections, Judge Friedman-Feldman acknowledged the exceptional nature of the proceedings, stating that there are many things in this trial that are not ordinary. The potential summons relates to the Case 1000 proceedings, which involve allegations of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust against the Prime Minister.

Summarized by baba from the reports of 3 newsrooms. Updated

Latest report: Channel 13. Read Channel 13’s original

The coverage

3 newsrooms on this story

Who covered it

  • LeftNone
  • Centre1
  • Right1
  • Haredi1
  • ArabNone

How it broke

See which of the 3 newsrooms broke it, and who waited

How the headlines differ

Channel 13Centre · the lead report

Judges Consider Summoning Attorney General in Netanyahu Corruption Trial

2 more newsrooms worded it differently