Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

not everywhere· Politics· Updated

Election Committee Rejects Petitions Against Netanyahu's Military Video

On Sunday, October 25, 2026, the Chairman of the Central Elections Committee, Judge Noam Sohlberg, dismissed three petitions against a video released by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The video, published on October 19, 2026, was filmed at the Ramat David Air Force base and featured Netanyahu standing in front of a fighter jet while warning Israel's enemies.

3 newsrooms · 1 language · since

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to save this article and find it on your phone.

or use an email code

What happened

  1. 01Judge Noam Sohlberg dismissed petitions against a video of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu filmed at the Ramat David Air Force base.
  2. 02The video, published on October 19, 2026, showed Netanyahu in front of a fighter jet warning Israel's enemies not to test the country.
  3. 03Sohlberg ruled the video's primary purpose was national deterrence and security, not prohibited election propaganda.
  4. 04The judge acknowledged that public assets were used and that attributing achievements to the government contained a propagandistic element.
  5. 05The petitioners, who argued the video violated laws against using public resources for campaigns, were ordered to pay 4,500 shekels in costs.
  6. 06Sohlberg warned that future similar videos will be harder to justify as security messages as election day approaches.

Petitioners argued that Netanyahu used public assets, specifically the military base and the jet, for election propaganda on his personal accounts. They also contended that the video's attribution of security achievements to the government constituted prohibited campaign material.

Judge Sohlberg ruled that the video's dominant purpose was national security and deterrence rather than election propaganda, and declined to order its removal. While he acknowledged the use of public assets and a propagandistic element in attributing achievements to the government, he found these aspects secondary to the security message. The petitioners were ordered to pay 4,500 shekels in legal costs.

Sohlberg warned that as election day approaches, it will become more difficult to justify similar videos under the guise of security messages. He cautioned that future similar publications will be scrutinized more closely and could be deemed prohibited campaign material.

Summarized by baba from the reports of 3 newsrooms. Updated

Latest report: Behadrei Haredim. Read Behadrei Haredim’s original

The coverage

3 newsrooms on this story

Who covered it

  • LeftNone
  • Centre1
  • Right1
  • Haredi1
  • ArabNone

Not in the Left or Arab press

How it broke

See which of the 3 newsrooms broke it, and who waited

How the headlines differ

Behadrei HaredimHaredi · the lead report

Election Committee Rejects Petitions Against Netanyahu's Military Video

2 more newsrooms worded it differently