Israeli Court Approves $100 Million Class Action Over Mislabeling of Sugar-Free Golda Ice Cream
תומצת מתוך Arutz Sheva על ידי baba
An Israeli court approved a 350 million shekel class action against Golda ice cream for falsely labeling products as sugar-free despite containing high lactose levels. The lawsuit covers purchases over seven years and seeks refunds and compensation. The case continues in court.
הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Israeli court approves 350 million shekel class action against Golda ice cream for false sugar-free labeling.
- Ice creams labeled sugar-free contained 6.6g lactose per 100g, exceeding the 0.5g legal limit.
- Plaintiffs include all customers who bought these products in the last seven years, seeking refunds and damages.
- Judge ruled labeling likely misled consumers into believing products had no sugar at all.
- Company temporarily removed disputed products and must pay 40,000 shekels in legal fees.
- Final verdict on consumer deception and damages will be decided after trial.
The Central District Court in Lod has authorized a class action lawsuit against Anita Glida Ltd., operator of the Golda and Anita ice cream chains, for falsely labeling certain ice creams as "sugar-free." The lawsuit claims that hazelnut and coffee-flavored ice creams sold for years under this label contained lactose at levels 13 times above the Israeli standard for sugar-free products. Laboratory tests showed about 6.6 grams of lactose per 100 grams, while the standard permits less than 0.5 grams per 100 grams to qualify as sugar-free.
Judge Iris Rabinovitz Baron ruled that the labeling could mislead reasonable consumers into believing the products contained no sugar at all. The court rejected the company's argument that the label only meant no sugar was added, noting that clearer wording could have prevented consumer confusion. The lawsuit cites consumer deception, statutory violations, negligence, and unjust enrichment as grounds.
The plaintiffs seek to stop the use of the "sugar-free" label on these products, demand refunds for customers, and claim compensation for alleged damages. The class includes all customers who purchased these ice creams over the past seven years in Golda and Anita stores or online, with estimated damages totaling approximately 350 million shekels (about $100 million).
Following the court's approval, the company temporarily removed the disputed products as a precaution. It was also ordered to pay 40,000 shekels in legal fees to the plaintiffs. However, the court's decision to allow the class action does not determine the final outcome, which will be decided after the full trial. The case highlights consumer concerns about accurate food labeling, especially for those avoiding sugar for health reasons, and underscores the importance of transparency in product information.
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 3ימין 1אחרים 2
לא אותו אירוע: ידיעות אחרות שחולקות עם הידיעה הזו אנשים, מקומות או נושא. רקע, תגובות והמשכים.
