Israeli Ministers Reject Supreme Court Ruling on Second Authority Council Composition
תומצת מתוך Kan News על ידי baba
Israeli ministers Shlomo Karhi and Yariv Levin refuse to comply with the Supreme Court ruling on the Second Authority Council's composition, rejecting any council actions not meeting legal criteria. A senior official dismissed their stance as symbolic, accusing them of seeking headlines without practical effect.
הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Ministers Karhi and Levin reject Supreme Court ruling on Second Authority Council composition.
- Government will not recognize council actions unless legal membership criteria are met.
- Senior official says ministers' decision has no practical effect, likening it to past symbolic refusals.
- The ruling reinstated the council despite membership below legal minimum.
- Government rejects any reliance on actions by a non-compliant council.
- Tensions persist between government and judiciary over authority and legal interpretations.
Following the Supreme Court ruling on June 17, 2026, regarding the composition of the Second Authority Council, Israeli ministers Shlomo Karhi and Yariv Levin announced the government would not comply with the court's decision. They declared that the government would not recognize any decisions, approvals, appointments, or actions taken by the council unless it meets the explicit legal requirements. The ruling reinstated the council from the previous government despite its membership falling below the statutory minimum.
A senior government official criticized Karhi and Levin's stance, stating their decision holds no practical significance. The official compared it to Levin's earlier refusal to recognize Supreme Court President Isaac Amit, noting that in practice, the committee proceeded to convene and select him. The official accused the ministers of seeking headlines rather than effecting real change.
Karhi and Levin emphasized that the government would reject any reliance claims or "acquiescence" by media market players regarding actions taken by a council not meeting the legal threshold. The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between the government and the judiciary, with references to a "regime change" and calls for a return to "common sense" in legal rulings.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 5ימין 3חרדית 2אחרים 2
