Israeli Government Refuses to Recognize High Court Ruling on Second Authority Council
תומצת מתוך Channel 13 על ידי baba
The Israeli government declared it will not recognize any decisions by the Second Authority Council that do not meet legal membership requirements, rejecting a High Court ruling that ordered the council's reinstatement despite insufficient members. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi and Justice Minister Yariv Levin emphasized adherence to the law over judicial rulings that contradict it.
הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Israeli government refuses to recognize Second Authority Council decisions lacking legal quorum.
- Decision follows June 17 High Court ruling reinstating council despite insufficient members.
- Government states rule of law applies to all, including judiciary, rejecting court's contradictory ruling.
- Communications Minister Karhi says court cannot override explicit legal thresholds set by Knesset.
- Justice Minister Levin warns ruling undermines separation of powers and stresses law as sole authority source.
- Government rejects claims that market acceptance validates council decisions without legal quorum.
The Israeli government unanimously approved a proposal by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi and Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Minister Yariv Levin, declaring it will not recognize any decisions, appointments, or actions by the Second Authority Council that do not meet the legal threshold requirements. This decision follows a June 17 High Court ruling ordering the council's reinstatement despite its membership falling below the statutory minimum.
The government emphasized that the rule of law applies to all branches of government, including the judiciary, and argued that a court ruling contradicting the law cannot grant authority that does not exist. Consequently, the government stated it will not acknowledge any outputs from the council's activities under these conditions. It also rejected claims from communications market stakeholders invoking "acquiescence" to decisions made by a council not meeting legal criteria.
Minister Karhi asserted that High Court judges are not the Knesset and cannot override explicit legal thresholds, calling the court's ruling an overreach and affirming that decisions by a council not meeting the two-thirds membership requirement are null and void. Minister Levin added that the rule of law binds everyone, including the judiciary, and that when a ruling directly contradicts the law, it undermines the separation of powers. He stressed the government's duty to ensure that only the law serves as the source of governmental authority.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 5ימין 3חרדית 2אחרים 2
