Channel 14 Wins Court Battle Against Joint List Over Election Coverage
The Haifa District Court ruled that the Joint List must allow Channel 14 to cover its election events and pay 18,000 shekels in legal fees. Channel 14 will donate the money to the "Koaḥ 100" legal defense fund. The Joint List had previously been disqualified and reinstated in elections due to terrorism support allegations. The court rejected the Joint List's claims of propaganda as justification for barring coverage, citing press freedom.
הידיעה ב-5 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Haifa District Court ordered Joint List to allow Channel 14 election coverage and pay 18,000 shekels.
- Channel 14 will donate the awarded funds to the "Koaḥ 100" legal defense.
- The Joint List was previously disqualified and reinstated in elections over terrorism support claims.
- The court rejected the Joint List's justification for barring coverage, citing press freedom.
- This ruling follows a similar legal victory for Channel 14 against left-wing organizations.
The Haifa District Court ruled in favor of Channel 14 on Monday, ordering the Joint List parties to allow the channel's news teams to cover their central election events. The court also mandated that the Joint List pay Channel 14 18,000 shekels in legal expenses.
Channel 14 announced that the awarded sum will be donated to the legal defense fund for fighters of "Koaḥ 100" (Power 100), an organization supporting soldiers. This decision comes just before the 26th Knesset elections.
The Joint List, comprising Hadash, Balad, and Ta'al, had initially been disqualified from the elections by the Central Elections Committee due to allegations of supporting terrorism. However, the Supreme Court later overturned this decision, allowing the list to participate after determining the evidence presented did not meet the legal threshold for disqualification.
The current legal dispute began on October 20th when a Channel 14 reporter was denied access to a Joint List press conference in Haifa. The Joint List stated the event was open to media but not "propaganda bodies aiming to disseminate specific messages." Channel 14 responded by filing a lawsuit, represented by attorney Yigal Danino, seeking equal access for its crews.
During the court hearing, Joint List representatives attempted to justify their refusal to allow coverage, citing Channel 14's alleged propaganda, incitement, and delegitimization against Arab parties and the public. They presented broadcast clips as evidence, but Judge Malka Spinazi-Shneor rejected their arguments. The judge stated that the presented claims did not justify denying journalistic coverage, emphasizing the public's right to know, freedom of the press, and freedom of occupation.
Judge Spinazi-Shneor referenced a 2022 Supreme Court ruling against the Meretz party, which had also attempted to prevent Channel 14 from covering its election headquarters. The judge concluded that blocking the channel, especially on election day, would cause irreparable harm to the channel and its viewers. She ordered the Joint List to permit the setup of a broadcast position, including all necessary logistical and technical aspects.
This legal victory for Channel 14 follows another recent court success where Judge Noam Sohlberg dismissed a petition by left-wing organizations, led by Zehavit Galon, against the channel's broadcasts, also ordering the petitioners to pay legal costs. Channel 14 had previously announced that any funds received in that case would also go to the "Koaḥ 100" legal defense.
מוזכרים
לא אותו אירוע: ידיעות אחרות שחולקות עם הידיעה הזו אנשים, מקומות או נושא. רקע, תגובות והמשכים.