מינוי Plus

התחברות ל-baba News

חשבון אחד לאתר, לאייפון ולאנדרואיד — המנוי נשאר איתכם.

או קוד במייל

חיפוש סיפורים

הקלידו לפחות שני תווים. התוצאות מגיעות מכל המערכות ש-baba קורא.

↑↓ למעבר · ↵ לפתיחה · esc לסגירה

התחברות ל-baba News

התחברו כדי להמשיך לשאול. News Plus מסיר את המגבלה היומית.

או קוד במייל

N12ביטחון

Israeli Supreme Court Rules State Comptroller Overstepped Authority in October 7 Review

תומצת מתוך N12 על ידי baba

מרכז

עברית · 12 מערכות מסקרות

The Israeli Supreme Court invalidated eight audit procedures by the State Comptroller on the October 7 security failure, citing lack of authority and procedural violations. The court emphasized that core security and policy issues fall outside the Comptroller's jurisdiction and highlighted the primacy of the state commission of inquiry.

הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba

  • Israeli Supreme Court invalidates eight State Comptroller audits on October 7 events.
  • Four audits canceled due to lack of authority over security and strategic policy.
  • Four audits returned to preliminary stage for violating right to fair hearing.
  • Court states Comptroller's role is limited to audits, not investigations.
  • State commission of inquiry preferred for examining core failures.
  • Comptroller may continue some audits only without relying on draft reports assigning blame.
Israeli Supreme Court Rules State Comptroller Overstepped Authority in October 7 Review
איור מערכת שנוצר על ידי baba News, לא צילום של האירוע.

The Israeli Supreme Court unanimously ruled on June 29, 2026, that the State Comptroller exceeded his authority in several audits related to the October 7 events and the subsequent Operation Iron Swords. The court invalidated eight audit procedures initiated by the Comptroller concerning the security failure on October 7. Four audit reports were canceled due to the Comptroller's lack of jurisdiction over core security and strategic policy issues, while four others were sent back to preliminary stages because they violated the right of those audited to present their arguments.

Justice Daphne Barak-Erez, writing for the panel including Justices David Mintz, Yael Wilner, Ofer Grosskopf, and Alex Stein, clarified that the Comptroller's role is limited to conducting "audits" that compare actions to established norms, not "investigations" aimed at uncovering factual realities. She emphasized that the Comptroller does not have direct authority over matters of foreign and security policy. The first petition, filed by the Military Advocate General, challenged audits on core security topics such as border defense in the Gaza Strip and the events of October 7.

The second petition, submitted by the Movement for Quality Government, addressed draft reports that had been circulated for comment, including audits on the security of a gathering in Re'im and the handling of civilian casualties. The court found that the Comptroller violated the right to a fair hearing by relying on draft reports that already assigned personal responsibility. The court ruled that the Comptroller may continue these audits only without using the existing drafts.

Justice Grosskopf noted that since a state commission of inquiry has already been established to investigate the failures, it is preferable for such matters to be examined by that body rather than the Comptroller. He stated that the commission should address the full scope of the failure, not just the limited aspects the Comptroller can review, and that the Comptroller should not continue audits on core issues at this time.

N12מרכז · נווה אילן

התחברות ל-baba News

התחברו כדי לעקוב אחרי מערכות, נושאים ואנשים.

או קוד במייל

ביטחוןנושא

התחברות ל-baba News

התחברו כדי לעקוב אחרי מערכות, נושאים ואנשים.

או קוד במייל

מוזכרים

סיקור מלא · 13 מקורות
ראשון: Behadrei Haredim · יוני 28, 2026

אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.

פתיחת המבזקים