Senior Prosecutor Says Judges' Recommendation to Drop Bribery Charge in Netanyahu Case Requires Rethink
Following Benjamin Netanyahu's testimony in Case 4000, judges recommended dropping the bribery charge, prompting a senior prosecutor to call for a reassessment of the prosecution's strategy.
הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Judges in Netanyahu's Case 4000 recommend dropping bribery charge after his testimony.
- Senior prosecution official says this recommendation demands a strategic rethink.
- Judges first proposed dropping the charge in June 2023 after hearing most witnesses.
- Prosecution opposed dropping the charge, expecting Netanyahu's testimony to strengthen their case.
- Judges remain unconvinced that Netanyahu's testimony supports the bribery allegation.
- The Attorney General previously rejected proposals for charge dismissal and criminal mediation.
A senior official in the Israeli prosecution service responded on Monday to the judges' recommendation in the Benjamin Netanyahu trial to drop the bribery charge in Case 4000 (Walla-Bezeq). The official stated that the recommendation "requires recalculating the course of action," noting that while this possibility existed before, it now carries different weight following Netanyahu's testimony.
The Jerusalem District Court judges, including Rivka Friedman-Feldman, Moshe Bar-Am, and Oded Shaham, reiterated their suggestion that the prosecution drop the bribery charge. This proposal came after both the prosecution and defense opposed hearing the case five days a week, effectively serving as an alternative to shorten the trial.
The judges first expressed this view during a June 20, 2023 meeting with representatives from both sides after hearing much of the testimony in Case 4000. At that time, the Attorney General rejected the proposal, as well as a suggestion to pursue criminal mediation. The prosecution believed it had sufficient evidence to prove bribery and expected Netanyahu's testimony to strengthen its case.
However, the judges' stance following Netanyahu's testimony indicates they were not convinced it aided the prosecution. They stated, "After hearing the Prime Minister's testimony, our position remains as it was in June 2023." This development signals a significant challenge for the prosecution's case moving forward.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 4ימין 3חרדית 2אחרים 1
