Jerusalem Court Upholds Bribery Charge Against Netanyahu After Cross-Examination
The Jerusalem District Court reaffirmed its position on the bribery charge against Prime Minister Netanyahu in Case 4000 after his cross-examination, rejecting attempts to revive the charge. Netanyahu and his lawyer opposed extending trial days and disclosing defense witnesses, warning of prolonged proceedings until 2028. The prosecution acknowledged the trial's difficulty but pushed to continue, while judges maintain doubts about the bribery evidence.
הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Jerusalem court maintains bribery charge stance against Netanyahu after cross-examination.
- Netanyahu and lawyer oppose extending trial to five days weekly and revealing defense witnesses.
- Lawyer warns trial could last until March 2028, coinciding with judge's retirement.
- Prosecution agrees five-day weeks are difficult but urges limiting defense witness time.
- Judges initially suggested dropping bribery charge three years ago due to evidentiary issues.
- Attorney General and prosecution insist on proving bribery during defense cross-examination.
Exactly three years after judges at the Jerusalem District Court suggested reconsidering the bribery charge in Case 4000 against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the court reaffirmed its position following Netanyahu's cross-examination on June 29, 2023. Despite the prosecution's efforts to prove bribery during Netanyahu's cross-examination, the judges stated their stance remains unchanged, indicating the attempt to revive the bribery charge has failed.
During the court session, Netanyahu and his lawyer, Amit Hadad, opposed the judges' decision to extend trial sessions to five days a week and resisted the order to disclose the full list of defense witnesses, aiming to preserve the element of surprise crucial in criminal trials. Hadad warned that continuing the bribery charge could prolong the trial until March 2028, coinciding with the retirement of presiding Judge Rivka Friedman-Feldman.
Hadad emphasized the unprecedented trial schedule, comparing it only to the Eichmann trial, and expressed concerns about the defense's ability to provide adequate representation under such conditions. Prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh acknowledged the difficulty of five-day trial weeks and suggested limiting lengthy defense examinations and scrutinizing witness relevance.
Three years ago, the judges had already expressed doubts about the bribery charge's viability in Case 4000 and recommended dropping it due to evidentiary challenges. However, the Attorney General, Gali Baharav-Miara, and the prosecution rejected this, insisting on proving bribery during the defense's cross-examination phase. The court also declined the prosecution's request to hold sessions during recess but agreed to add more trial days next year to expedite proceedings.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 4ימין 3חרדית 2אחרים 1
