IDF Skeptical of Hamas Commitment to Disarmament Agreement Amid Gaza Tensions
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have expressed skepticism regarding Hamas's adherence to a recently announced agreement to disarm the terrorist group and allow civilian movement in Gaza. The agreement, brokered by UN envoy Nikolay Mladenov and supported by the US, Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, the UAE, and the UN, was declared on Friday. Mladenov also urged Israel to begin a "step-by-step" withdrawal from Palestinian territories as a condition for progress.
Israeli officials quickly responded, emphasizing that no Israeli withdrawal from the current "yellow line" would occur without Hamas genuinely dismantling its weapons. A senior Israeli security source described the notion of Hamas relinquishing control as "utopian dreams," suggesting the group is using the agreement to buy time to regroup and rebuild its capabilities while issuing vague statements about disarmament.
Meanwhile, IDF Southern Command Chief Major General Yaniv Asor, supported by Defense Minister Israel Katz, continues to advance Israeli operational control in Gaza. The focus remains on security, expanding control along the "yellow line," and locating and destroying terror infrastructure such as tunnels and underground networks.
A source in Southern Command detailed Hamas's ongoing preparations, including intelligence gathering, public intimidation, taxation, funding flows, spreading extremist ideology, recruiting young activists, and preparing for future conflict with Israel. Daily provocations against IDF forces along the "yellow line" persist.
This military stance follows recent IDF plans to expand control in Gaza and intensify efforts to target Hamas commanders and dismantle terror infrastructure. Concurrently, the US is organizing a multinational peacekeeping force of about 200 troops, equipped with armored vehicles and military gear, to initially operate in Rafah, pending approval from Israel's security cabinet.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.