Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

SrugimSecurity

Former Shin Bet Official Criticizes Lifetime Security for Sara Netanyahu

Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba

Religious-right

Hebrew · 11 newsrooms covering

Yaron Blum, former senior Shin Bet official, criticized the decision to grant Sara Netanyahu lifetime security protection, calling it illogical and accusing Shin Bet chief David Zini of yielding to pressure. Blum stressed that indefinite protection is not standard practice and questioned the long-term nature of the decision.

The story in 6 lines · by baba

  • Yaron Blum opposes lifetime security protection for Sara Netanyahu as illogical.
  • Blum says Shin Bet protects government symbols, not individuals indefinitely.
  • He calls a 20-year security assignment "delusional."
  • Blum accuses Shin Bet chief David Zini of yielding to pressure.
  • No details were given on the security scope or conditions.
  • Blum supports protecting officials but not lifelong protection decisions.
Former Shin Bet Official Criticizes Lifetime Security for Sara Netanyahu
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Yaron Blum, a former senior Shin Bet official and coordinator for captives and missing persons, publicly opposed the decision by current Shin Bet chief David Zini to grant lifetime security protection to Sara Netanyahu, wife of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Speaking on the radio program "Sheva Tisha" on 103fm, Blum argued that lifetime security is illogical and not standard practice within Shin Bet. He emphasized that the unit responsible for protecting public figures is meant to secure symbols of government authority, not to provide indefinite protection from the outset.

Blum described the idea of securing someone for 20 years or more as "delusional" and criticized Zini for succumbing to unspecified pressures in making this decision. While he did not disclose details about the scope, start date, or conditions of the security arrangement, Blum focused his critique on the long-term nature of the decision and the process by which it was made. He acknowledged the necessity of protecting government symbols but opposed the granting of lifelong security in this case.

The controversy highlights internal disagreements over security protocols for high-profile individuals in Israel and raises questions about the influence of external pressures on Shin Bet leadership decisions.

SrugimRight · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 12 outlets
First: Ynet · Jul 15

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire