Haredi Draft Law Debate: Will 'Change Bloc' Approve Court-Challenged Legislation?
Translated & summarized from Behadrei Haredim by baba
A Channel 13 discussion explored whether the Haredi parties could join the "Change Bloc" and pass a draft law acceptable to the judiciary. Senior Haredi commentator Yisrael Cohen stressed legal approval is key for Haredim, while legal correspondent Aviad Glickman doubted the Supreme Court would approve a Haredi-backed draft. Political commentator Raviv Drucker dismissed the notion of a "legal deep state" favoring the left, suggesting the Haredi draft law would not receive judicial approval.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- A Channel 13 debate questioned if the 'Change Bloc' could pass a Haredi draft law approved by the judiciary.
- Senior Haredi commentator Yisrael Cohen stated legal approval is the Haredim's main concern for any agreement.
- Legal correspondent Aviad Glickman doubted the Supreme Court would approve a draft acceptable to the Haredim.
- Political commentator Raviv Drucker called the idea of a "legal deep state" approving laws for the left a myth.
- Drucker suggested the Haredi draft law would not be legally approved by the 'Change Bloc'.
A heated discussion on Channel 13 debated whether the Haredi parties could join the "Change Bloc" and if this bloc could pass a draft law acceptable to the judiciary. Senior Haredi commentator Yisrael Cohen stated that any agreement with Liberman would hinge on its legal approval, emphasizing that this is the Haredi community's primary concern. Legal correspondent Aviad Glickman expressed doubt, saying, "I don't see the Supreme Court approving a draft outline acceptable to the Haredim." Political commentator Raviv Drucker sarcastically suggested that the idea of a "legal deep state" approving laws specifically for the left is a myth, asserting that the Haredi draft law would not pass judicial review under the "Change Bloc." Drucker implied that the "Change Bloc" could not guarantee judicial approval for a draft law favored by the Haredim, referencing a conversation with Supreme Court President Yitzhak Amit regarding the 2018 Liberman plan.
Mentioned
