Israeli Basketball Derby Sparks Outrage Over Lengthy Game and Refereeing
Translated & summarized from Mako by baba
Maccabi Tel Aviv beat Hapoel Tel Aviv 80-73 in a basketball derby that lasted nearly two and a half hours, drawing widespread European criticism. Observers lamented the game's excessive length and frequent referee reviews, with some calling for rule changes. The third quarter alone reportedly lasted almost an hour, highlighting the controversial pacing.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Maccabi Tel Aviv defeated Hapoel Tel Aviv 80-73 in a lengthy basketball derby.
- The game lasted nearly two and a half hours, drawing European criticism.
- Journalists and bloggers called for rule changes due to excessive referee reviews.
- The third quarter of the match reportedly lasted almost an hour.
- European observers expressed frustration with the game's length and officiating.
Maccabi Tel Aviv defeated Hapoel Tel Aviv 80-73 in a basketball derby that lasted nearly two and a half hours, drawing significant criticism across Europe. The extended game duration and frequent referee interventions, including numerous video reviews, were the primary points of contention. European sports outlets and journalists expressed frustration, with some calling for rule changes to prevent such marathon matches.
"Eurohoops" acknowledged Maccabi's win but highlighted the "very long and very hot game, with refereeing decisions that stole the show." Spanish journalist Alex Molina stated, "The rules need to be changed. The officiating was problematic, it was a marathon in every sense." The sentiment was echoed by blogger Arai Amin Aydemir, who claimed, "The referees ruined the game between Maccabi and Hapoel. They went to the monitor every time, every time."
Further criticism came from BSLPicks, which noted, "The game between Maccabi and Hapoel was not predictable. The third quarter lasted almost an hour." The overall sentiment from European observers was disappointment with the game's excessive length and the perceived over-reliance on video reviews by the referees, suggesting a need for adjustments to the sport's regulations.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.