How to Challenge an Arbitration Award in Israel: A Legal Guide
Translated & summarized from Arutz Sheva by baba
An Israeli attorney explains how to challenge an arbitration award, emphasizing that it's not an appeal but a process focused on procedural flaws. Israeli law lists ten specific grounds for cancellation, requiring proof of a defect and a resulting miscarriage of justice. Strict deadlines, generally 45 days, apply to filing such challenges, making prompt legal consultation essential.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Challenging an arbitration award in Israel requires proving procedural flaws, not that the arbitrator was wrong.
- Ten specific legal grounds exist for challenging an award, focusing on fairness and jurisdiction.
- A claimant must prove both a legal ground and that the flaw caused a 'miscarriage of justice'.
- Requests to cancel an award must generally be filed within 45 days of its issuance.
- Consulting an attorney immediately after receiving an unfavorable award is crucial due to strict deadlines.
An arbitration award, intended to be a final resolution, can be challenged in Israeli courts, but only under very specific circumstances. Attorney Amir Rubin, an expert in arbitration law, clarifies that challenging an award is not an appeal; courts will not re-examine the merits of the case or decide who was right. Instead, the focus is on identifying procedural flaws that meet the narrow criteria defined by law.
Israeli law outlines ten specific grounds for challenging an arbitration award, primarily concerning the arbitration process and the arbitrator's authority, rather than the outcome itself. Rubin categorizes these grounds into four key questions: Was there a valid agreement and jurisdiction? Was the process fair, allowing each party a proper opportunity to present their case and evidence? Did the arbitrator fulfill their obligations, such as providing reasoning or adhering to agreed-upon legal standards? Finally, are there exceptional circumstances, like the award being contrary to public policy or involving fraud?
Even if a valid ground for challenge is identified, it must be demonstrated that the flaw caused "miscarriage of justice" (עיוות דין). This means proving that the procedural defect actually harmed the applicant's rights or influenced the outcome. Parties who did not raise objections during the arbitration process may find it difficult to prove a miscarriage of justice. Furthermore, courts have discretion and can choose to cancel only part of an award, amend it, or return it to the arbitrator.
Crucially, strict time limits apply to filing a request to cancel an arbitration award. Generally, this must be done within 45 days of the award being issued or delivered. However, if the opposing party has filed a request to confirm the award, this deadline can be shortened to 15 days from the notification of that request. Rubin emphasizes the importance of acting quickly, as a well-founded request filed late may not be considered on its merits. He advises consulting with an arbitration lawyer immediately after receiving an unfavorable award to assess potential grounds for challenge and gather necessary documentation.
Mentioned