Israel's Attorney General Will Not Appear in Netanyahu Trial
Translated & summarized from JDN by baba
Israel's Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara will not personally attend a discussion with judges in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trial, her office informed the court. A senior prosecution team will represent her, citing procedural reasons. The defense had requested her appearance during the testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit. Baharav-Miara and State Prosecutor Amit Issman remain open to plea deal discussions, though Netanyahu has not responded to a presidential inquiry.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara will not attend a hearing in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trial.
- The prosecution team stated they are authorized to represent the Attorney General in court.
- Defense attorneys requested Baharav-Miara's presence during testimony from former AG Avichai Mandelblit.
- The Attorney General and State Prosecutor are open to plea deal discussions.
- Prime Minister Netanyahu has not responded to a presidential inquiry regarding a deal.
Israel's Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara will not attend a discussion with judges concerning the trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh informed the Jerusalem District Court on Wednesday that the prosecution team is authorized to represent the Attorney General and convey the judges' remarks. Tirosh stated that Baharav-Miara's personal appearance is not in line with the prosecution's work procedures, emphasizing that a senior team, including the Deputy State Prosecutor, is present to relay all necessary information.
The request for the Attorney General's appearance was made last week by the defense attorneys for Netanyahu and Shaul Elovitch, who sought a discussion with Baharav-Miara. Judge Oded Shacham noted that the panel had already considered the possibility. Tirosh argued that the Attorney General appearing in court while her representatives are present would be an inappropriate procedure for the prosecution system.
The defense's request came during the defense's presentation of its case, following the testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit. Defense lawyers questioned Mandelblit about investigation approvals and information he received. The defense attorneys then sought to speak with the current head of the prosecution system.
Attorney Amit Haddad told the judges that the court has the authority to summon Baharav-Miara even if she does not wish to attend, citing a Supreme Court case where the State Prosecutor was summoned. Tirosh added that Baharav-Miara and State Prosecutor Amit Issman are open to direct discussions regarding a potential plea deal. She stated that both had previously responded positively to such an inquiry, but Netanyahu had not. Tirosh mentioned that their positive response to the President's inquiry was made after internal discussions, but Netanyahu chose not to respond, leaving their affirmative answer pending.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 5Right 1Haredi 1Arab 2Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
