Unity Government Unlikely, Says Former Minister Ramon
Translated & summarized from Maariv by baba
Former Justice Minister Chaim Ramon believes a unity government is unlikely, calling it an "illusion." He stated that Gadi Eisenkot could form a government on paper, but Benjamin Netanyahu lacks sufficient mandates. Ramon suggested a minority government with external support as the only viable option, arguing it would be difficult to overthrow. He also proposed that elections should be held with Eisenkot leading, not Netanyahu.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Former Justice Minister Chaim Ramon stated a unity government is unlikely and based on "illusions."
- Ramon believes Gadi Eisenkot could form a government on paper, but Netanyahu lacks sufficient mandates.
- A minority government with external support is the only viable option for a stable administration, Ramon argued.
- Ramon suggested elections should be held with Eisenkot leading the government, not Netanyahu.
- He warned that Netanyahu could win future elections if he remains head of a transitional government.
Former Justice Minister Chaim Ramon has dismissed the idea of a unity government as "illusions," stating that it is unlikely to materialize amidst the current political drama surrounding the formation of a new government. Speaking on Radio 103fm, Ramon expressed skepticism about the chances of unity, particularly in light of Gadi Eisenkot's efforts to form a government after receiving a mandate from the President.
Ramon suggested that while Eisenkot could theoretically form a government on paper based on his four-point plan, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lacks the necessary support, with a maximum of 53 mandates. He posited that Netanyahu might prefer a prolonged transitional government, potentially leading to elections, especially if a conflict with Iran were to occur, which he believes would depend on President Trump. Ramon also criticized a potential strategy suggested by Avigdor Lieberman to negotiate with the ultra-Orthodox parties, arguing that their conditions would be too difficult to meet and would likely be invalidated by the High Court of Justice (Bagatz).
He further elaborated on the possibility of a minority government led by Eisenkot, which could potentially gain support from Arab parties in initial votes. Ramon clarified the distinction between a coalition and external support, emphasizing that a minority government with external backing is the only viable option for a stable administration. He argued that such a government would require 61 votes to be overthrown, and the Arab parties have indicated they would not readily cooperate with Netanyahu to bring down such a government, unlike their past actions during the "change government."
Ramon questioned the logic of allowing the government that led to the current emergency to remain in power, suggesting that elections should be held with Eisenkot, not Netanyahu, at the helm. He acknowledged the daily challenges of managing a minority government but proposed that its initial actions could include establishing an inquiry committee, canceling unnecessary ministries and coalition agreements, and addressing Jewish lawbreakers alongside counter-terrorism efforts.
Concluding his remarks, Ramon stated that the current choice is between the "least bad" options and warned that if Netanyahu remains at the head of a transitional government for an extended period, he might also win future elections.
Mentioned