Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

DavarSecurity

Israel's Supreme Court Upholds Safety Officer Mandate for Construction Sites

Translated & summarized from Davar by baba

LeftNeutral tone

Hebrew · 2 newsrooms covering

Israel's Supreme Court has upheld a Ministry of Labor requirement for safety officers at construction sites with at least 50 employees, rejecting an appeal by the Association of Contractors and Builders. Enforcement of the mandate will be delayed by one year, until October 2027. The court affirmed the Safety Administration's authority to require safety officers based on risk assessment, while acknowledging the contractors' concerns about the scope of the regulation.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Israel's Supreme Court upheld a mandate for safety officers at construction sites with 50+ employees.
  • Enforcement of the safety officer requirement will be delayed by one year, until October 2027.
  • The court rejected an appeal by the Association of Contractors and Builders against the Ministry of Labor's rule.
  • Safety officers are certified professionals responsible for advising on and ensuring worker safety at construction sites.
  • A group advocating for worker safety criticized the delay, citing high accident rates in construction.

Israel's Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal by the Association of Contractors and Builders against a Ministry of Labor requirement for safety officers at construction sites employing at least 50 workers. The court clarified that the dispute primarily concerned sites with 50 to 100 employees, as regulations already mandate safety officers for sites with over 100 workers. The Ministry of Labor announced it would delay enforcement of the ruling by one year, to October 2027.

Justice Alex Stein, writing the decision, stated that the court would not interfere with the Safety Administration's professional discretion. The regulations grant labor inspectors broad authority to require safety officers at any site where risks warrant it, even those with fewer than 50 employees. Safety officers are certified professionals responsible for advising on worker safety, developing safety plans, identifying risks, and investigating accidents. They are employed by construction companies and typically oversee multiple sites.

The appeal was filed in response to a March announcement by Chief Schwartzman, who stated the ministry intended to enforce the safety officer requirement immediately. The contractors argued this represented an extreme expansion of regulation unsupported by data. However, Justice Stein noted that during discussions, the Safety Administration agreed to the court's proposal to postpone enforcement for a year.

Following the enforcement freeze, the Safety Administration will consider the contractors' arguments "with an open heart and willing spirit, even if only for the sake of good law," Stein added. However, the ruling does not diminish the administration's authority to mandate safety officers at any site or company immediately if deemed necessary.

The Group for the Struggle Against Building and Industrial Accidents praised the court's decision but lamented the enforcement delay, arguing it endangers workers. The group highlighted that construction sites are the most dangerous workplaces, with a significantly higher fatality rate than other industries. As of the article's publication, 38 workers had died in construction accidents since the beginning of the year, with thousands more injured.

DavarLeft · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 2 outlets
First: Calcalist · 9h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Related stories · 3

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire