Netanyahu Maneuvers to Disrupt Eisenkot's Government Formation Efforts
Translated & summarized from Cursorinfo by baba
Gadi Eisenkot's mandate to form a new Israeli government is threatened by coalition disagreements and Benjamin Netanyahu's influence. Key obstacles include negotiations with ultra-Orthodox parties over conscription and securing a 61-seat majority. Netanyahu is reportedly pushing for a "government of national unity" to counter a coalition reliant on Arab parties. Potential partners may be using tough negotiation tactics to gain concessions before the deadline.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Gadi Eisenkot faces challenges forming a new Israeli government due to coalition partner disagreements.
- Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly trying to influence the process and retain political power.
- Negotiations with ultra-Orthodox parties over military conscription are a major hurdle.
- Securing a 61-seat majority remains difficult even with potential ultra-Orthodox support.
- Potential coalition partners may be employing tough negotiation tactics to gain concessions.
- Donald Trump is reportedly pressuring Benjamin Netanyahu regarding his war initiative.
Gadi Eisenkot's attempt to form a new Israeli government is facing significant challenges due to internal disagreements among potential coalition partners and efforts by Benjamin Netanyahu to retain influence. Eisenkot has approximately six weeks to assemble a coalition, with this being potentially his sole opportunity to become prime minister. Failure to form a government could severely weaken his political standing.
A major hurdle involves negotiations with ultra-Orthodox parties, particularly United Torah Judaism, whose agreement to join the government remains uncertain. Disagreements are expected over a conscription law for the ultra-Orthodox, with Avigdor Lieberman reportedly maintaining his demands despite previously softening his stance on cooperating with these parties. Lieberman has proposed a 2018 bill as a compromise, but its legal viability and suitability for the army's needs are questioned.
Even if a deal is reached with the ultra-Orthodox, Eisenkot may still fall short of the required 61-seat majority. Some members of the "Change Bloc" might resist significant concessions on military service, having promised a more equitable distribution of the burden. The position of Naftali Bennett on potential coalition arrangements is also unclear.
Meanwhile, Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly advocating for a "government of national unity." Analysts suggest this is a tactic to prevent a government reliant on Arab parties and to influence undecided parties, presenting it as an alternative to Eisenkot's government or new elections. The "Change Bloc" is also considering legislative actions before a new government is sworn in, such as changes to Knesset committees, to weaken the current government and pressure the ultra-Orthodox parties.
Further complicating matters are the distribution of political portfolios and influence within the potential coalition. Some partners' firm statements may be negotiation tactics aimed at securing concessions as the deadline approaches. While united in their desire to oust Netanyahu, these parties may not automatically support Eisenkot without further demands, including potentially a long-term prime ministerial rotation. Negotiations with ultra-Orthodox parties like Shas and United Torah Judaism could also be used as leverage within the opposition bloc. An alternative of a minority government supported by Arab parties is opposed by Lieberman, highlighting the deep divisions among potential coalition members. Separately, Donald Trump is reportedly pressuring Netanyahu to fully implement his war initiative.
Mentioned
