Sara Netanyahu Drops Lawsuit Against News Outlets, Continues Case Against Telegram Channel
Translated & summarized from Kipa by baba
Sara Netanyahu has dropped her NIS 500,000 defamation lawsuit against Channel 12, Keshet 12, Kan 11, and journalist Omri Maniv. The case, concerning alleged leaks about a planned assassination, will continue only against Udi Mizrahi of the "Hadashot BeZman" Telegram channel. The media outlets agreed to publish the court's ruling as part of the settlement. Mizrahi claims the information originated from Vered Gross, a friend of Netanyahu, who allegedly relayed it from her. Netanyahu denies having access to or involvement in security discussions.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Sara Netanyahu dropped her NIS 500,000 defamation suit against Channel 12, Keshet 12, Kan 11, and Omri Maniv.
- The lawsuit alleged Sara Netanyahu leaked information about a planned assassination.
- Legal proceedings will continue solely against Udi Mizrahi of the "Hadashot BeZman" Telegram channel.
- The media outlets must publish the court's ruling as part of the settlement.
- Mizrahi claims Vered Gross, a friend of Netanyahu, was the source of the leaked information.
- Netanyahu denies participating in or having access to security discussions.
Sara Netanyahu has agreed to drop her NIS 500,000 defamation lawsuit against Channel 12, Keshet 12, Kan 11, and journalist Omri Maniv. The lawsuit stemmed from publications alleging she provided advance information about the planned assassination of Hezbollah leader. The agreement is conditional on the media outlets publishing the court's ruling in the same manner as the original reports. The legal proceedings will now continue solely against Udi Mizrahi, manager of the "Hadashot BeZman" Telegram channel.
Mizrahi alleged the information reached him via the grandson of Vered Gross, a friend of Sara Netanyahu, who acted as an intermediary. During the hearing, Mizrahi described the alleged information chain: "Every time we wanted information, we would ask the grandson, and he would ask the grandmother, and she would ask Netanyahu." Sara Netanyahu, present in the courtroom, reportedly chuckled at this.
Netanyahu has vehemently denied these claims. In a document disclosure, she confirmed knowing Gross and being in contact, but stated their meetings and conversations were infrequent.
Mizrahi attempted to present the basis for his claims and the credibility of his source.
During the hearing, Judge Wenschel attempted to broker a settlement between the parties. After addressing Netanyahu's attorney, Uriel Chor Nizri, and the media representatives, he remarked, "The general context raises questions of fairness, but you can end the case by agreement." The parties accepted the proposal, agreeing to dismiss the lawsuit against the four defendants, contingent on the publication of the ruling. However, the dispute with Mizrahi remains unresolved, and the agreement does not determine whether the information was indeed transferred from Netanyahu's circle.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Right 1Haredi 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.